From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C81381F3 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74076E09B5; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86104E099B for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 20:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id wo10so7737650obc.17 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:48:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=S7nAFlCQRjfXTDq1A738gpzyf5jjAUFta6fFeRujNIU=; b=u0wtp5cf1P/Al7GC9I0qgsIgZbGlCOs/YETVCGMIejk99eNdkvAOOiPDzb3ErFxhyJ Wb5NiEcYxhKAgiqQSbs8tGZZrNYqaObdVejmXtJYPVzsoKwgjitrEutj0u5l37JiSnW+ vtxqAjTTzLnTEnDWqSUtIwlyChupg8jfcHkle1xXvlYvmOkMb4fT4MD0rXOW83oo7WEl VLxOiZAEtUcoT5TM54fkq8rfnSpOKNEo/SGQRE8uq7zoRPD3s9glRGkjxEtYce9Vck5a iPvUPow6ycHPbDyPh6Twr7U6UI3HbjRDzxk1W0fU67C+Wx8a6nTQm9GrGCWzF6R+odXw VylQ== X-Received: by 10.60.133.243 with SMTP id pf19mr1304474oeb.118.1371761313613; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h4sm543889oel.2.2013.06.20.13.48.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:48:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:48:29 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eselect init Message-ID: <20130620204829.GA23719@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130620171027.GA31429@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130620171027.GA31429@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 68b44158-37e0-47c3-b6fe-d5e0c56a9432 X-Archives-Hash: 30a2ce2ae1d77835d9c45a29126dfa47 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:10:27PM +0100, Steven J. Long wrote: > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > > - only init is currently handled by eselect-init, which is now using a > > very small wrapper POSIX shell script to redirect the calls to the > > currently running init >=20 > How does say, switching inittab format, work under this setup? I think this is a separate issue -- if busybox init's inittab is a different format than sysvinbb's inittab, it should also use a different file name, e.g. bb-inittab or something similar. bb could fall back to inittab, but I think it should look for something liike bb-inittab first. That way eselect init wouldn't have to worry about it at all. William --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlHDap0ACgkQblQW9DDEZTizbwCfTNYrvAoUXmKfQJUup2eqlBcs YH4AmwfOd5PzYseBBE8UVCKSoxzpyQ2T =EwRP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--