From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFB41381F3 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0855EE0999; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:08:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8126E0964 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:08:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B23133E1C6 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:08:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] unpacker.eclass extensions Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:08:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <51BC282E.9020306@mva.name> <201306170155.10347.vapier@gentoo.org> <51BEB7A9.6090901@flameeyes.eu> In-Reply-To: <51BEB7A9.6090901@flameeyes.eu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1775809.nJBQs8Gkq6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306171208.31369.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9d107bf0-5168-4365-bae6-2aa8b535a848 X-Archives-Hash: e84e9d8c20c176aa885d0dd54712983a --nextPart1775809.nJBQs8Gkq6 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 17 June 2013 03:15:53 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > On 17/06/2013 06:55, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> > tar -xJf "./$i" > >=20 > > why doesn't the bzip2 detect as bzip2 ? >=20 > Capital J is XZ not bzip2.. still, it makes me think it needs a newer > version of file to recognize it. the stupid default font doesn't clearly render that. guess that's the olde= r=20 LZMA format rather than the newer XZ as the latter can be detected by file. =2Dmike --nextPart1775809.nJBQs8Gkq6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRvzR/AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBPSwP+wa0Uwxlz6j8FqEzkXCZTe7W NtiT5sejH4zLJM9omYN39KmcXfMxQmUIqY2E8dek1pJj1xJUYfIEQqP6m3WViMjx M8dpAIugAvnhYzDxSR1B8Ej6atOAP+0C7cVsJw/ZLfQbFj8LNBl1fBcFh3adpY0m O8ns+WuMDHCfahMJOens7YXfn1rZekwVrrRqznQrPOSTAKmAvNfXdTU/ZUbUvD5v S2ySWceGoA9oD3L/19cPGmVn+h62usi9Qyyi2X3OJT4BKnBJBXV19wtUn1LComO8 wNFOmmKzB07tD9IKbwdeKYtFwaTkHxUg7BFgGIOp8vtelLcmqN2GD7UWKbe2bDgZ 72N6c+pcJtsSLNFs304UZGkyLPfc1rvg/aSZaQ5ySxbSoVyeX1Lt6vzcnaG3V8C9 Ch+vKT3q3HAvei7KrR6IJC/2WDxPLGw9rIxJMHTtwSbl80lQH69IeZoxHhjhMOS3 Wzn3bOVvMqfy6bNQybLDu3QBOWEVFjxAhRVu8jO3qMVTBzi+Ro/XVpWYUziK3zug QkCkMZ3PY3rivi/GvghPZcSW0WorcDDtIaxp8iBO/F+ZWp9GZQBemw7Umjn56Ls9 5o5x+VMw2rE7STSPpV3VWqr26v8XP6ZAc/rddg2G3CxHhr5MddStqUo2i+dT5v7j Z0u4cOODE/41WIeoIID9 =Kzk2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1775809.nJBQs8Gkq6--