From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC32A1381F3 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 238E9E095A; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com (mail-ee0-f50.google.com [74.125.83.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 116B1E0929 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 22:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id d49so1377931eek.37 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=NFAXVWU8IbbJ1QqzvzQ9FyducjmsIrroi3D/jDxvwRw=; b=PB3WhfKiKsHwSq1bYeql+P9i/6p+3ujaEdI5Q12KZKkNa2aJ7K+e6yR3mx/BIhiJxd PeF6rxaNj+3oKYZdmhbLcsp0QRwAh/V6wUStatKy/RoAeP7fdaHRG++Sq43yATrEYsM7 9UbL+oor7L/XJa+pRoi8ldtMp9lFe2r9Hyjzp5ZbAOsMjkaAy9oNO6SQ4AecsTA9md7N 96rS3l1gT9j8du6YgfH4BwETwaL4i7izHLAGjdakNpehqqoVLiD7GOB0qdzq3ZfK0dp9 rmrzWIdQWo5PLXI5V2/vYPPpymrgZSZIhmrih1UVBeRsvK0BDg9D8pp90OBYBaZYnuUq rMmg== X-Received: by 10.14.215.5 with SMTP id d5mr13590189eep.143.1371420954603; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y10sm19257468eev.3.2013.06.16.15.15.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 23:15:49 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Message-ID: <20130616231549.726ebb99@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <51BE34CC.3090906@gentoo.org> References: <1371376191.10717.15.camel@localhost> <1371390923.28535.67.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20130616164445.0c8f8f55@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1371402560.28535.79.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <1371403298.22480.8.camel@localhost> <20130616202324.45cb3262@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <51BE34CC.3090906@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/t3LsubbmyoR.RisZn8Vq3Wr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: a5e92d87-5120-4073-b29b-5b33bc00a6c2 X-Archives-Hash: 712fe97a66d0d8a0477a0e801fe990a4 --Sig_/t3LsubbmyoR.RisZn8Vq3Wr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:57:32 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > It's actually not bad, since all of the subslot rebuilds are triggered > in a single backtracking run. Anyway, I welcome having people work on > competing package managers, trying to do all of this stuff more > efficiently. :-) I'm starting to think we're all doing this wrong by going for a naive "single choice then backtrack" model, fully consistent or otherwise. Perhaps we're going to have to bite the bullet and go for stronger propagation models and one of the many better alternatives to backtracking... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/t3LsubbmyoR.RisZn8Vq3Wr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlG+ORgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhE2zACg0oKkBF7zeb73V0/DbTVztSsL +d8AmwaJLudkL/pMr3TIYNnasPsqVTj0 =gLaY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/t3LsubbmyoR.RisZn8Vq3Wr--