From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358DB1381F3 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:44:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C16A4E0919; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:44:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com (mail-we0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B87FEE0815 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w59so1768469wes.38 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=IXcyB7k/Ff95ryJe5z3Mu1YetpVCXf836sIOjNAmX8I=; b=aeNjWROfnKFveDq5ZaUpIThXsJTFGHYcBYhA+houiAtsODiRA4qfojYNb2PDsdCbDl rWTnMDCGKyp77AWiFDBT4ozHKQxOoxxfKNu6u0RcaSDrHUubDVZakBGJSfQKbTSoGARd JNBvo7l0j4YuxJsTgPPQZXucvvY5KbTHk3pZcPiNCE6sh0YxCbydJ1uJCXEwUMfBhGdG ORxUhxxztvD2NkEZ9N947uDoHVt5Hm+IvutWE6ZHvjxAsPX6fLexdv0zAfOCiHjb/SEv 7VNdk0/O+zQKtEoTiYn8YwPsxStwmS6WSdcdsqHE9Z9xNd8nsggHQlvK/hTHLYdbMf+n o/MA== X-Received: by 10.180.189.136 with SMTP id gi8mr3266638wic.11.1371411839387; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm16926140wiv.0.2013.06.16.12.43.58 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:43:54 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Message-ID: <20130616204354.5e2f6ae4@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130616202324.45cb3262@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> References: <1371376191.10717.15.camel@localhost> <1371390923.28535.67.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20130616164445.0c8f8f55@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1371402560.28535.79.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <1371403298.22480.8.camel@localhost> <20130616202324.45cb3262@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/QrfjP.bg6LkgkDWKifbSzX9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 89d9d050-282b-4840-b7b3-c6444801e01f X-Archives-Hash: 40f9e1882167438180d56214c09d0dcb --Sig_/QrfjP.bg6LkgkDWKifbSzX9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:23:24 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > Is it possible to reasonable enhance the Portage code to improve dep > calculations in a reasonable amount of time? Before you start looking at speed, you should make it do full, correct dependency enforcing. Get it right first, and fast later. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/QrfjP.bg6LkgkDWKifbSzX9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlG+FX0ACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFJlgCggsX8+vKxJ/EOpj3oLRk51+Vz dTgAoJoGG9bAfKQkRNlS+vL/7xc0pVok =Wijj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/QrfjP.bg6LkgkDWKifbSzX9--