From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178E21381F3 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E83ACE08D1; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerard.telenet-ops.be (gerard.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.48]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE65E086B for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by gerard.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id p6XM1l00Y2khLEN0H6XMbp; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:31:21 +0200 Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:28:47 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Message-ID: <20130616202847.78b2d3fd@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <51BDF570.1050603@gentoo.org> References: <1371376191.10717.15.camel@localhost> <1371390923.28535.67.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <20130616164445.0c8f8f55@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <1371402560.28535.79.camel@big_daddy.dol-sen.ca> <1371403298.22480.8.camel@localhost> <51BDF570.1050603@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/pxMIPj9+xu2.Gk9vO58h94/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4d558c51-a2df-4991-b4c4-4b5b0918cf69 X-Archives-Hash: 88ea585eafcd6489ca5f04c82a267bd5 --Sig_/pxMIPj9+xu2.Gk9vO58h94/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:27:12 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 06/16/2013 07:21 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 10:09 -0700, Brian Dolbec escribi=C3=B3: > > [...] > >> Thank you for considering helping. I have stayed away form the > >> intricate details of package management in the past, but I also do > >> not like how long portage is taking now for dep calculations.=20 > >=20 > > And, cannot that efforts be put in enhancing portage instead? > >=20 >=20 > How many forks do we got now? How much longer are we going to hold on to something that suffers from feature creep and is based on a design invented years ago that doesn't take into account the new features (eg. subslots) that are added today? See my reply to Pacho for more insight why we can't enhance Portage. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/pxMIPj9+xu2.Gk9vO58h94/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvgPfAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9LEEH/iFsBD5eeVMqhe1tZNBP0xlc KGcbY/HIX8FO6YIPHHCXNi9HHLevenf1dV0N2IOAOUEMRQvv/mB6L6cnS6ZJPa8p kX7uOdT2849VmiU8YEiac7a7ANOuhP6DWX+BMR/j8IqPngwwQ+XDpKz1GqlS3fEG vAZtFphO5VNXhz6wTrDBtP9enFIQwJWiFq9ddHIMgHpfdTDLHqzDmFTLYw/y67MN PjZ+XOzC6sNhwfwjX+zrJLWxcOVvutNltbTUZCAx0wdmKCIGDepL6ujccoLkfeRz UNddItTbv4bngQBpRoTfHwEUktA3HmTTC3PMRum263lw5mZ8G63TC4nsCd48mfQ= =0tL/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pxMIPj9+xu2.Gk9vO58h94/--