Dnia 2013-06-15, o godz. 18:25:15
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> >>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, hasufell  wrote:
> 
> >> PMS doesn't guarantee that die works correctly in a subshell:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12800011.3.3
> >> 
> >> So the devmanual agrees with the spec, and the eclasses need to be
> >> fixed.
> 
> > How does that make any sense?
> 
> It makes perfect sense. The specification doesn't require that the
> package manager's die function works in a subshell, so ebuilds and
> eclasses cannot rely on such behaviour.
> 
> If you want a different behaviour for future EAPIs, then PMS needs to
> be changed.

And there's a bug open for it already:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465008

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny