From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09941381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56128E0975; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47E75E094C for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y10so2019197wgg.4 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:01:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=FQYOTI6VmJThv49YlWRE72g8rDiPsuctbBXEHN1tyjk=; b=pSNOlwTCqcXk7W2uwWRKvSaJgm+wNualUPl1bzvaf5dGedYeWfjEOlzQ4+qu56cWQP x9R18ttFWknQ5Rs4xQLFrK+xbxo5ZJYaZDeCE+0pFg1r/daRCbkWFeOGa5m29NjWGpY3 dYrpKNxdEfAdoSwn7Pv6FbZYPD5Ap4fnDwDnqan/BiGyK3P9jTYm82rZ0IzDqMg8XsC+ vmj5dG7b73bxcwxAiDbHF4BBhLCdV5CHLlKepGc6u6+/GAc4hIz3BQJ6RGQonWBnlv1V swOHWto8K+wDGV3yFrSJch/o8w1Jqgp2z5BKoKwUnTEfys5b2Lprn5u0wsFrvXD0RkaF 9bSA== X-Received: by 10.181.12.1 with SMTP id em1mr1392835wid.4.1371315693830; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cw8sm10705244wib.7.2013.06.15.10.01.33 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jun 2013 10:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:01:29 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell Message-ID: <20130615180129.72c2ca8b@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130615174230.33a7592c@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/F9TswVQ3DW6Bj28LWYr5Exp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 53dd212a-4eb3-47bf-90a4-87d1e15e2721 X-Archives-Hash: 430490676110700fe46899cc3b2c9fb2 --Sig_/F9TswVQ3DW6Bj28LWYr5Exp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have > implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS > to properly document the behavior seems reasonable. Part of the point of EAPI stability is that it doesn't just apply to current versions of package manglers. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/F9TswVQ3DW6Bj28LWYr5Exp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlG8newACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEkHgCeNKL7GmfcLMq5ZHJWOwFIJGUN 1wQAoOda+BqmGVRHm9e+RtuOJn9znm4A =NGSE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/F9TswVQ3DW6Bj28LWYr5Exp--