From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C1F1381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B26DE0980; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (mail-wg0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 831E6E094C for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 16:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e11so1330969wgh.30 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; bh=WqDcNA5HfWe7oeUfSx+6b54q/ThZT0HVd0Z73kW7SNw=; b=cWWLZJp9iH/R5hpWrnnZmv56/ITQIVDyObVieGky65cQBc86fNf4rebcNz3ASoT6wa wPG25NPstiGTR/j7UE0m7Qa58xnbJ1MoHOS2MRQ9MgthOHko9V1l46fgsmI7IYSGEyIM vj8cJHuXKpAyBuqolCH0uhyPxVMk2ngjWUR1zta+zQg7V55Wadghzr0S/eG5yUned6o+ odo9hmFKvG7HIcYRLN+gzPZtE8Qe0VMBNrE0kExc/J/cv/GOWd7mzSxw/fJItGEqDJJr Y2m4dPWWsy7bh2PJ8PocfRkevgGSWlCSQLCGFO7ulRftfo1/nYvj28CezLE9p6rUwnnj wLXQ== X-Received: by 10.194.6.99 with SMTP id z3mr4156577wjz.57.1371314555216; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dz8sm10578688wib.11.2013.06.15.09.42.34 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Jun 2013 09:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 17:42:30 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Calling die in a subshell Message-ID: <20130615174230.33a7592c@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> References: <51BC9105.5070604@gentoo.org> <20924.37728.751450.362549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130615182413.2e1b2f8a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/six+mcdTvWV/VW3sS65CTfN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 0233d317-0cd9-42d1-9285-a33bc25ffa4f X-Archives-Hash: 0d8eef854427f66f5f56c79ee8eeea5b --Sig_/six+mcdTvWV/VW3sS65CTfN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:24:13 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > What does it take to change future specifications to guarantee this? You can have it from EAPI 6 onwards. > What's holding this from becoming guaranteed? Why not fix the specs? The specs accurately reflect Portage behaviour at the time the specs were approved. The point of a stable EAPI is that once approved it doesn't change. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/six+mcdTvWV/VW3sS65CTfN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlG8mXkACgkQ96zL6DUtXhEpLgCdFUte8Vukfr0v9P4m/qC+KD2g sG8AoNoAxphp4GSeI33vVQwqwJ5V9u1o =PrSr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/six+mcdTvWV/VW3sS65CTfN--