From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAF81381F3 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B46E2E09C1; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1710E09A9 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:24:49 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (josoe mo16) (RZmta 31.27 AUTH) with ESMTPA id L06f4cp5FCc7L4 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:24:48 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] SRC_URI behaviour Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 15:26:40 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.10.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <51BC2C55.7010506@mva.name> <51BC690D.4030203@flameeyes.eu> In-Reply-To: <51BC690D.4030203@flameeyes.eu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8418390.S5E0hnq4DE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306151526.40947.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 7f689cac-e112-40b8-b7d6-f2646ff1bce6 X-Archives-Hash: 063e659e3e38d7bc3556922a276a7271 --nextPart8418390.S5E0hnq4DE Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Samstag, 15. Juni 2013, 15:15:57 schrieb Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2: > On 15/06/2013 14:06, Rich Freeman wrote: > > At work just about every boss I have had any respect for would have > > fired me on the spot for making such a statement and not retracting it >=20 > At work you're also paid to for the time you spend justifying for the > Nth time why a proposal is completely crazy and something that no sane > people would accept. >=20 > Nobody pays me to waste my time in explaining *again* why VCS ebuilds > should be a corner case and not something to spend time making easier to > create (because that's what it boils down to). How about a blog link or a pointer to an old thread instead? =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart8418390.S5E0hnq4DE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJRvGuQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOcmXIP/1DIqhEps/Uj7aVbGkXf2vV1 /z9ld5n8++cITj5X/IP1jlawS0B186s3ctttqoIRgxQLo2+ygiWsmrqc96BcC624 9kvhzO5g44CAKMzQ5jQqHitgWY/oWccHtmoqeowB03pEHbcJeZKz4O8SPoV09IZm Ygs2fBcymWhcl7pq14NxPwSJ7MXUzfJzOFlT/6wBt27nAJxF8XTGFJEVopV+An0m IokVzGSm+ouK+HMhjI5Z/IJd2qoeM8X6pmv6K/6UvAdaRFnN9XpAmAmTfOyUlFpy hg7ph3uU2Aa7U+QolMsX3IPh9i0CaiPHbnQvgnS5vZarNfzUsglZtAZHuY3HjH/G 6Querl3TE3XW2YQCnyUgTSfKEubDTc9NtOXXIFt5j+/trSoIhI1srXqVV/kU3lRH NiY5aKxAmEbZXZXE7OcjZpeh21H8EwrgF2yGxhsipEFbCrqPn8dVFR4iV/SRPYJp Dw2nvL3H4HZM/KewgJN+8jmT61EGElNBHkWBHjtQJiX6xa5GohWHf/uLi1ztjvxe 5dRcf5SQbbWO3gMkacRG3Q+j9oF2HonTtvKj/mIQXRAXv/S/u/lEn0+ov4kZ6NSJ TOLoxDho+GzDFnxQxgXGvFDiBryO9dp7PCd0eZiUP7hFPy1+AmWoy/VY7U4yovBu zjCEfJdqnpNn4A/hk0O5 =Gx1L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8418390.S5E0hnq4DE--