From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B64F1381F3 for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60CD6E0A8D; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:37:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jacques.telenet-ops.be (jacques.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304BCE09EF for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 06:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by jacques.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id i6dV1l00X2khLEN0J6dV9e; Thu, 30 May 2013 08:37:30 +0200 Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 08:35:22 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Switchup-mode and boottime selector? Was: eselect init Message-ID: <20130530083522.0e1338c9@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20130530002232.GA7140@linux1> References: <20130527224021.GA18963@waltdnes.org> <20130528135619.44259b60@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130529105249.433e57f0@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130529181554.GB23135@waltdnes.org> <20130529215600.0e53c63f@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130529205523.GA6281@linux1> <20130530020642.59449daf@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130530002232.GA7140@linux1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/nU+V/cDPD6vTrKNyE31AKcr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 90de5491-fe44-4db2-a7a5-90d2f18031a5 X-Archives-Hash: e00f5d5b1d6a5f7c0f9238db10340d2e --Sig_/nU+V/cDPD6vTrKNyE31AKcr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 29 May 2013 19:22:32 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > > For the same reason we have all the other eselect modules. > =20 > We could probably also turn gcc-config into an eselect module if we > want to use that argument. Looking at Duncan's reply, that has already happened in the past. Really, think about it, why do we have all those eselect modules at all? Why be inconsistent and not introduce one here? Why keep them around? Well, the answer is simple: Remember that eselect init is optional and an opt-in by emerging it, this is in no way suggested anywhere to become a default on all systems. If you don't want it, fine, but that doesn't stop us from pursuing it... --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/nU+V/cDPD6vTrKNyE31AKcr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRpvMqAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9iSEIAK0RE+gZyzM18mfNY9rq/ziv o4I1d/Y1nU734w1EHvfzBUuWd09T8ksBltHcKoEmVx0yOPJBrDC99Rh8qBKBDFEN T+t0s38xX8YTxahyu9Kwpz1HT9NRXvr8//j1xUMpH6+l8oKgZYeTYWozzAfzjyXO e0XrIR2bIXASSXWBDWlixZRMROeYDigV4fXQH6CaKv10fMHvkiPt4P9vLKCHmKUx VjQuSHqezKnnk4ao+Hp6FlWkK5qLou/KS4o1UnVjw0I6GdVFZrrvlkrHK3voAJl8 TZA0oO1sbvHRFmeXxopxCKOghsXqO2gfBxpqdM44dAiSdIfBAr43S386PtRN6OE= =cEvZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/nU+V/cDPD6vTrKNyE31AKcr--