From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4F1381F3 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAA09E0AD5; Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA7BE0ACB for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 22:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id o17so10609293oag.41 for ; Tue, 28 May 2013 15:15:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=fL/XMYUgRNjGUMJVYHSb6/MHHgEgazDiiHKw0fn+7sI=; b=hPxc4/ckfEGASbHaqPkaci1/68XV7g/+Trjej5Uw53BnxshJyClwq1eg8v9te7HT2o NZwMSWiMRpxNbAEorgSRursTxOXE5/HBi0J8oiPqv9leVTfQAarwBQH5lxnuAUPvk2kO xOWZyGzM/swOc+LwKbOY+tF6kFqGyLVdEZCkEfIFi+X9VhSmUlVfJ39RjgWizRT61Jub Yvf46hCQUqzeDmj3ZJxlluxZflGcjMw9OhWlQIi5izkZAADzjknlYIFI2FsdbN/ayZr5 kgq2Z0XSrZlMHnQLq6kVijQZBJrfVvDAC4qh1xoQDz3IPApasNKAog8nXDyIOkRmCGNK u9sQ== X-Received: by 10.60.99.10 with SMTP id em10mr21627201oeb.58.1369779345030; Tue, 28 May 2013 15:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c20sm37878978oez.4.2013.05.28.15.15.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 28 May 2013 15:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 28 May 2013 17:15:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:15:40 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND flag for www-servers/monkeyd Message-ID: <20130528221540.GA2053@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <51A3C431.7010900@gentoo.org> <20130528173513.50742051@gentoo.org> <51A4FDFF.3020103@gentoo.org> <20130528210737.42695fc9@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130528210737.42695fc9@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 46b12882-a61e-4c6c-85fe-ee644b403b24 X-Archives-Hash: a53a66fc16c81a8f5a2316070481ac73 --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:07:37PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > For the others, how large is the benefit of having them switchable? > At least some of them look like something that wouldn't hurt people if > it was always-built. The dev manual states that use flags are to control optional dependencies and _settings_ which a user may reasonably want to select [1]. Since the developer gives us the ability to control this with configure switches, I feel pretty strongly that we should give the user that control. William [1] http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/index.html --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGlLIwACgkQblQW9DDEZThw0wCcCDe1hT1yrDFevF5C1kz5ZI0p 46YAn2rjzrS6wUw7Piov2BOieiG/98dk =+mI8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L--