From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A051381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E3FAE0BD2; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D330E0BC9 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 22:58:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id wo10so3894269obc.24 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 15:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=e49r/E03ihyx9FjykMA1wbLHUkluCBtSK1JBoEjnodM=; b=fV067FRxUur2pQfqVn392lT0Znozc6ta0qoJXj448eW4AGDtdpr41k8chxNzBORHNq VlenG6fwWpn9HabmYh2Y2RCpf0s7ZlVZtbmRUogtKeOa5qjoTStJaJcBPmzqUUHPF0nR zQYAC1gosGaMe4Fys3fVtXF5E1Rwln51AGt71wbfXwzJNPmKsXALiJ/Q4nPjeZJnBszR X6EtYA3YWLFtzCQ8nUicW/n/wxtZXi+QNGI7VgsFYNH+42o66aXx5hZe0AHFSlQBsoEJ Yi68qTkJfYBRDAtMmemqpx0yQRCGAiUu1fMWCp2DjfK9DzTQUGUZ/oOr3uz2L2vDM65s RQrA== X-Received: by 10.182.111.132 with SMTP id ii4mr13191988obb.16.1369609097628; Sun, 26 May 2013 15:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm28415021oes.6.2013.05.26.15.58.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 26 May 2013 15:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 26 May 2013 17:58:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 17:58:13 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Luca Barbato Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect init Message-ID: <20130526225813.GA22273@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Luca Barbato References: <51A08A68.3020900@gentoo.org> <20130526084332.1a8afa69@gentoo.org> <51A1DC0C.2070706@gentoo.org> <20130526164106.GA21548@linux1> <20130526164830.GB21548@linux1> <20130526185545.77a2d6e3@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130526185545.77a2d6e3@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: bff113c3-f43a-491c-95e4-4fb1cb8c9c76 X-Archives-Hash: b3f8572539d602282a0a28b7593f499b --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 06:55:45PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Sun, 26 May 2013 11:48:30 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:41:06AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 11:55:24AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > > > > Openrc is small, but the wrapper really needs to know which is whic= h and=20 > > > > worst case switch inittab. > > >=20 > > > Please explain why this wrapper would need to switch inittab. Inittab= is > > > only used by sysvinit and has no uses in any other init system. > >=20 > > Ok, sorry, I was wrong in my previous msg, now I see that bb-init has > > its own inittab with a different format. > >=20 > > How about patching bb-init so that it can handle a sysvinit inittab? >=20 > Er, isn't that too far to diverge from upstream? If we're to patch > something, I'd rather patch it to use a different path. =46rom what I just read, the difference is that busybox init ignores the runlevels specified in sysvinit inittab. I guess it isn't an error for the runlevels to be there, it just doesn't do anything with them. Luca, If that's the only difference, do we really need to modify the inittab at all? William --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlGik4UACgkQblQW9DDEZTgwEgCgkCbBrCiAEHVnBqOodgaksY+k en8AoILl8ofQhJCtLiPmG3MyVJBQJK86 =3Wha -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--