From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98911381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68F88E0D12; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F81FE0D0B for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:50:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (178-37-163-206.adsl.inetia.pl [178.37.163.206]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9EB133DF72; Sun, 26 May 2013 07:50:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 09:45:44 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: yngwin@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) Message-ID: <20130526094544.21daba37@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <1369501216.3001.4.camel@localhost> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/h24736hFvVn/tk7kxyLx+UF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 03065c9a-3c59-42d1-8369-90095e335196 X-Archives-Hash: 0c52a8d9b5637567e59efe22fe334eac --Sig_/h24736hFvVn/tk7kxyLx+UF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 May 2013 15:15:18 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 26 May 2013 01:00, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > We can now have long discussions about upstream decisions, how to handle > > devrel problems... but I think it's much more easy: this kind of > > "boycott" attitudes should stop in favor of common sense. >=20 > Common sense would be to recognize that systemd is a bad > implementation of a bad idea, and to boycott it distro-wide. >=20 > But you know what they say about common sense... As in, say, lastrite GNOME and tell users to switch to other distro? Or maybe everything using udev? Sounds much like the way to get the 'one distro' dream some people have. But wasn't the intent opposite? --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/h24736hFvVn/tk7kxyLx+UF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRob2oXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKHREP/joYMmrNRqmTwhgnewU87cQ1 QMyYbOA9MfjsgYcfKrgrBdiWxb+pdCc9i3f3/pMptHDq4TlnRbWHtmIkQKOBQBao egg+SHMA+JuFg7mxVnF3PxVjdsRIwGLSVp0aM7lowxJu1uO5io1iaLWOQerf2BZW nDsHHCpGKX3uiRMHDnsQtVj0GgY5Jo4AMmIuUbbsld2Drjjno+flkB+NNYBeHWFA +npj6Ud9sixERYGby0jcPVbdPHI1x6Rll4CMzMgB0MY5uvOQfLOYOPYZYaI3W/7R AWwutga/9xzA582uXiG+YFSmSyFTYYhqdoXCa2Sc4zhllWzZE9gMJCq1U0pblMUr qTfIl/AASEhpqRgfTnW0Jkgped4oGSZTnP702ZEtjb9iviCqCuTkstH85i4Zot33 +jJA0kr+SuZPVEP9gO4U43WnFhx5MBTEzp18RAs38GYMcOS1yanugZgqyTDf8yqU +MMoCRiCOt9fCAHQNWifeG3ohY/k/O02P59GAySJR9Nni+dYbUNwYolC3Qh38xpD JlnNKRC6s/6VO1qdDKO2+N62kVt2bv9whE6tE1TCqkXfuQP8jhVODkLHkjmjXb4H FoBDvUSgeqxiwoY5yT9EC1sRECZEUg/k3po6Og12XdWXuVMR/34F6Fda1ecQ7neR DQeHjfP63OErOn4wJsp0 =Gfkl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/h24736hFvVn/tk7kxyLx+UF--