public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: dlcampbell@gmx.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 08:55:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130526085538.42214885@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A1AA83.4080209@gmx.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2503 bytes --]

On Sun, 26 May 2013 01:24:03 -0500
Daniel Campbell <dlcampbell@gmx.com> wrote:

> On 05/25/2013 02:53 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> > We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not
> > providing systemd units).  We should come to better consensus on systemd
> > integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I
> > don't know that it is a working solution yet.  I have to oppose adding
> > unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier,
> > regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space
> > aggressively.  And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering
> > ebuilds with USE flags.
> > 
> > Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting
> > out?  I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I
> > would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test.
> 
> I'm not a dev (though I would like to be...), but consider me interested
> in testing an opt-out method as well. I'm going to try INSTALL_MASK and
> see what happens. I'm not sure if any of my packages have systemd units
> yet, though.

Please fix your e-mail client to send replies to the mail you are
replying it, instead of the top mail in the thread.

> As far as resisting systemd, why is that so bad? Vertical integration is
> generally a bad idea with the sole exception of when your use case(s)
> line up perfectly with the ivory tower and you need all of the offered
> features. If Gentoo falls to systemd, there will literally be no
> Linux-based distros left to prevent it from taking over, and as a result
> Linux-based systems will become more and more tightly integrated,
> killing the choice that Gentoo truly stands for and homogenizing everything.

It is bad because ebuilds are not place to put politics into. If you
want to become dev, you should understand this. We are supposed to be
serious people. Serious people don't break user systems or refuse to
support them in the name of manifesting their wishes.

It is bad because it's not systemd that's losing, it's Gentoo. Except
for the fact that there's just a few people that take Gentoo seriously
these days.

Upstreams clearly show that they don't care. We can either sit
in the corner and resent, or we can work on improving the situation.
And going on flamewars or manifestations doesn't really improve
anything, you should know that by now.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 966 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-26  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <51A1A294.3000609@sporkbox.us>
2013-05-26  6:24 ` Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697) Daniel Campbell
2013-05-26  6:55   ` Michał Górny [this message]
2013-05-26  7:37     ` Daniel Campbell
2013-05-26  7:56     ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 16:14 Ben de Groot
2013-05-25 16:48 ` Michał Górny
2013-05-25 17:38   ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-25 20:02     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-05-25 20:40       ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-25 20:45       ` Michał Górny
2013-05-25 21:38   ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-26  7:23   ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26  7:43     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26 10:04       ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 15:21         ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26 16:15           ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-05-26 17:14             ` Matt Turner
2013-05-26 17:19             ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-05-26  7:54     ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 17:00 ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-25 17:14   ` Carlos Silva
2013-05-26  7:15   ` Ben de Groot
2013-05-26  7:44     ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-26  7:45     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  9:59       ` Luca Barbato
2013-05-25 18:13 ` Markos Chandras
2013-05-25 19:53   ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-05-25 19:58     ` Mike Gilbert
2013-05-25 21:55       ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-05-25 19:59     ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26  7:00     ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  7:22     ` Tiziano Müller
2013-05-26  7:46       ` Pacho Ramos
2013-05-26  7:49       ` Michał Górny
2013-05-26  7:00   ` Ben de Groot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130526085538.42214885@gentoo.org \
    --to=mgorny@gentoo.org \
    --cc=dlcampbell@gmx.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox