Re: [gentoo-dev] robo-stable bugs

[Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>]

On Tue, 21 May 2013 13:46:18 -0700
""Paweł Hajdan, Jr."" <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On 5/21/13 1:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 May 2013 20:51:52 +0100 Markos Chandras
> > <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> I'd rather not see this process changes, because it has helped 
> >> bringing the stable tree up2date. However, given that *a few*
> >> people don't like it, I suggest you don't file bugs for packages
> >> owned by them.
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> > I am (was) unhappy with some corner cases that used to happen (like 
> > bug #428968 ) but overall I consider it very useful;
> 
> Thanks, Alexis.
> 
> One note about that bug: with lots of bugs being filed, it's not
> really feasible for me to track comments like that one.

I know its not really feasible; in this case the annoying part is,
besides the noise, the automated ccing of arches if there is no answer
when there actually was one on the first request. Anyway, you seem to
have fixed it because its been a while since I have not seen it (maybe
by ignoring packages that have a wontfix automated stablereq bug?).

Alexis.