TL;DR: I like the stabilization bugs as they are.

> >            Summary: Please stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1
> 
> We agreed a little while ago that bug Summaries should start with an
> atom, if possible, and explain the action later. Also, robotically
> filing thousands of bugs and making them say "please" every time isn't
> going to endear anyone to your cause. So do something like this:
> 
>     "<cat/pkg-version> stabilisation request"

No opinion about the order of things, that's imho nitpicking. The "Please" 
does not hurt anyone.

> 
> >                URL:
> > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-libs/libconfig? arches=linux
> 
> Is this URL useful to include, or did you just want to abuse every
> last feature found in pybugz? Wouldn't maintainers already know where
> to find this kind of information? Who do you think is your audience?

It's convenient, although redundant. Why is it a problem to have the URL 
there? Maybe someone finds it useful.

> >           Severity: enhancement
> 
> Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se? If all stabilisations are
> enhancements, then why isn't Severity set to Normal instead? (What is
> an enhanced severity to begin with, Mozilla?)

That's how it has been done for a while now with stablerequests. You're 
clearly an oldtimer. :)

> Also, your script does not set the STABLEREQ keyword. People are having
> to hunt down your robo-stabilisation requests and add it themselves.
> You should just do it yourself or turn your script off.

Well, that was as far as I can remember a deliberate decision- maintainer 
action should be "set STABLEREQ keyword and CC arches". Probably the keyword 
could already be preset, though.

-- 

Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer 
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/