From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-60197-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDC01381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:24:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65718E0A02;
	Sun, 12 May 2013 18:24:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FD00E0951
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:24:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 15384 invoked by uid 501); 12 May 2013 18:24:09 -0000
Message-ID: <20130512182409.15383.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:24:09 +0200
From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual moved to github
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <CAGfcS_nM07SYo0g6TvYm8qDWAh9FwqCmc+EgWzYGz3DnP8RTDA@mail.gmail.com> <kmof14$lhj$1@ger.gmane.org> <518F7DE2.70703@gentoo.org> <20879.38369.270576.25249@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <518FAF6B.80501@gentoo.org> <20879.47550.568189.770408@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <518FBB3D.1030002@gentoo.org> <CAGfcS_nM07SYo0g6TvYm8qDWAh9FwqCmc+EgWzYGz3DnP8RTDA@mail.gmail.com> <20130512172003.9979.qmail@stuge.se> <kmojmu$4fe$1@ger.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <kmojmu$4fe$1@ger.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: a8567620-a934-443c-ad2c-145d368a0321
X-Archives-Hash: c6cf791502cdcc5de53993ceba61d28f

Michael Palimaka wrote:
>> I agree that Java is sucky, but I don't think that rejecting Gerrit
>> for that reason alone makes sense. Look at what the application does
>> and how it works, to determine if it fits the project or not.
> 
> I agree, but if infra is not willing to maintain something java-based 
> there's not much we can do about that.

We (well you) could try to join infra.


>>> Another option that looks nice is GitLab.
>>
>> How does it work? The screenshots look exactly like github.
> 
> That's the point. :-)

Ok, do you know if it also enforces some particular workflow like
github does, or if there are knobs to twiddle?


//Peter