From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D761381F3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7498CE0951; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:22:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E4CE0901 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 18:22:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15207 invoked by uid 501); 12 May 2013 18:22:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20130512182248.15206.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 20:22:48 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devmanual moved to github Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20879.47550.568189.770408@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130512172003.9979.qmail@stuge.se> <1818351.4idgze6HqD@virtuoso> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1818351.4idgze6HqD@virtuoso> X-Archives-Salt: c14f4a44-58bf-47a5-9a06-882199e8606e X-Archives-Hash: 6398971e2fbd7a5a050109a7f82c4339 --JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Theo Chatzimichos wrote: > > > Another option that looks nice is GitLab. > >=20 > > How does it work? The screenshots look exactly like github. >=20 > Don't ask, just go for it! That's not very helpful? I'm happy to expand on my experience with Gerrit, and I'll gladly answer specific questions if I can. > It's a few steps to set up, but it's not too bad. Great! Have you run it in production or in a lab? Did you encounter any non-obvious issues? > I agree that github is sucky, but I don't think rejecting GitLab > just because it looks exactly like Github makes sense. Where did you get the idea that anyone is rejecting GitLab? Especially surprising that you think that *I* would reject GitLab, since I'm not even a developer. (Comparing github with Java doesn't make much sense.) > Look at what the application does and how it works first. Yes indeed, obviously I tried that, but the gitlab.org webpage doesn't have a lot of information beyond the github-like screenshots. Hence my question to the list, where perhaps someone can talk about gitlab based on their experience. All pointers to better resources are surely appreciated not only by me. //Peter --JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFRj934hR3Q0dhIfEgRAq6JAJwIgGF8u5Q9FBCqJTpnJzmPVdxDXgCePQYe FNLzp/lr3Rf4PWVVj7PnmN8= =9mcb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JcvBIhDvR6w3jUPA--