From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCC81381F3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DCF9E09B1; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06019E090E for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 13:27:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22928 invoked by uid 501); 12 May 2013 13:27:57 -0000 Message-ID: <20130512132757.22927.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 15:27:56 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] devmanual moved to github Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <518F7DE2.70703@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 951e086a-3cd5-4ced-b3a1-2e99b0bbc85a X-Archives-Hash: 71803f339bca7765e9e0c68d2ea20d1c Rich Freeman wrote: > > The devmanual git repository[1] moved to github[2]. > > The only thing that isn't FOSS is github itself. Not sure if > others feel strongly about it. I feel strongly against github. Making something like github the primary point of contact communicates many negative things for Gentoo IMO. On the technical level I think it's unneccessary and concretely unhelpful to limit a git repo workflow to the subset that github implements. I guess that Infra might also feel strongly about this. I hope Markos discussed the move with them already and that any concerns of theirs were understood. //Peter