From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9CB1381F3 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 04:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E985E0A6D; Thu, 2 May 2013 04:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5ECE0A69 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 04:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971CB33E00D for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 00:20:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20130429075549.06e8ad66@gentoo.org> <20863.50740.368896.545732@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130430173803.0522c7e5@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130430173803.0522c7e5@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1678799.GzWzhGmpXx"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305020020.55595.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 70665f7b-9067-45af-8e4e-e3e525c72134 X-Archives-Hash: 42dc88264772a3bb07ab670b767abc14 --nextPart1678799.GzWzhGmpXx Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 30 April 2013 12:38:03 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:25:08 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > Below is a patch that brings the spec in line with common sense. > >=20 > > And in fact, I wonder why we're even discussing the issue. > > Paludis was fixed already more than a year ago: > > http://git.exherbo.org/paludis/paludis.git/commit/?id=3Dad2ae2ba3b6fc8f= 1136 > > 38a86de0e7d8a6a046091 >=20 > We're discussing a matter of principle... we all get the principle. the only contribution you've made here is to was= te=20 everyone's time. =2Dmike --nextPart1678799.GzWzhGmpXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRgemnAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBKGEP/0Ble9nMxZdBDkY26N05Ur7D 3sKaFhNQQ+pYOFGbJM6HLIle1DDWpXysJ9r383pLz10C/g9+9FdkBBDvkdG5v9xv wWORTfWWch2R4pjQLZ3AYg4wYHnJg2kqFnsgox3J2IrwDfb2kGb4zNnmQ8nFMevp hamAX/+ubaABREl58aLSQkVUzo++y1NzPRmfMQpXy1+HX7WYNXAKF7YtskwpMgP1 ucqtSwYIUmjpgWQGPm7vncbxHHk1Or/X6NJIJAOAcOpSmW4AxO3HjquTF7pptPyk eJR+tybrF+FRSrDvsgVK2kviyXW3b/VM/h44Npn0dE9dg0IQYDh9ZPuwaoGOXVSE 0FVoPxA1uGmIurSU1bxNZQ5t/eK4x32xbSCfytlezs/OEiEDvsIKVMa/OukDQO3K 3VBjTpqWCNxkNc8mvLP5qcP+qeKmq6mtNialJkvKoVJ1UipQ7VNHhClpK3dn3wxg mYf92xRYbJVfp9RnnbkuBvHDxX5tG8rkTgvjKCG5Eczjkdkx76r+H28zt65Ih/D4 Y+GiuDG/3ytUQDxX3jYb7jKWR7vLykQfDxKYd0J6n//oVBK3aJD4CIFq/PnG5YfT CKEN8QU8inSivmitPlscmEaY3xfZ3DPzR7VD31hje/LvXuADqHo9bbBvxb3K4npu M5TrWFmXQBceZoPPNqM/ =2Y29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1678799.GzWzhGmpXx--