From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC871381F3 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFAAFE09E9; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1104E09B4 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:30:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CF433DFAC for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:30:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.421 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.090, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.509, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRDj1FGECpng for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E39C33E021 for ; Thu, 2 May 2013 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UXiLD-0007wu-ES for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 03:29:47 +0200 Received: from 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([71.17.69.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 03:29:47 +0200 Received: from dirtyepic by 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 May 2013 03:29:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 19:40:06 -0600 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: <20130501194006.37ae36c8@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> References: <20130429075549.06e8ad66@gentoo.org> <201304291436.42577.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130429194917.46d4985c@googlemail.com> <20862.56778.599974.921136@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130429215950.019cd23b@googlemail.com> <20862.62111.902255.208565@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130429232709.6d755604@googlemail.com> <20130430121213.330244bc@googlemail.com> <20130430195203.0af69d0e@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <20864.48351.787701.613857@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/E5x1ZkfbR1bSZWlrIDbnDF3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 71-17-69-121.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Archives-Salt: f89ce1f0-5ab4-4fec-b0b1-19e9d7b0a467 X-Archives-Hash: bc65743158768a689742819b24e25f9f --Sig_/E5x1ZkfbR1bSZWlrIDbnDF3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 1 May 2013 08:57:35 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Ryan Hill wrote: > > Then the person implementing the code for Paludis is either a monkey > > or a robot*. Anyone capable of reasoning could puzzle out the > > implications of not allowing user-given options to override the > > defaults. Obviously you can write code that follows a spec but is > > still broken or useless. >=20 > > *or both (?!) >=20 > Oh please... The person simply made a mistake, which happens when > programming, and which he fixed. No reason for calling him names. Sorry, I was under the impression that they were refusing to acknowledge it= as a mistake on the grounds that it was allowed by the spec, despite the consequences, and demanding ebuilds to be "fixed" instead. I have other na= mes for those people I could use but I doubt you'd like them any better. --=20 gcc-porting toolchain, wxwidgets @ gentoo.org --Sig_/E5x1ZkfbR1bSZWlrIDbnDF3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJRgcP3AAoJEO04vUmVeoRj6kQH/1h8gCldK1Mt8Ct35/BsR3wn 6IsHI3fF7qFpLBOMvJTuC5OVJQVs+lBiOhZ//LCn2L3rZQMUs+VfF+tTI5niez2y CXhkX+QYKaU2Pj9Yy7G71j90lvGadEbE29BGgHDyTCPhPmIsMm6PnjFrseG5GVcq A/GcRllELb72UA3pz9tt1sIgaPDMyypxkzrJNr3sDCg9Iu7MzxpRH3Cy/lpg5n8z zwpdGo3spDrTos8Uimafb5bkv8t4S9DJ9VlTxmWUaX/9IPqCqgiMWznZpwKpsaZM Ufy35msMSdu9SetwWynp6oYoMh1LbYf4J1YEEzwq/19VdkM/vEPKVonrI9xZasc= =Bv1L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/E5x1ZkfbR1bSZWlrIDbnDF3--