From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834D81381F3 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76258E09A8; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7F5E0998 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:47:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id m15so2876631wgh.3 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:47:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=1XNYb043Lsa+D+iVPMOXypvMGjjzpTlQ2TCyRk0RG+g=; b=kmoSKwj3PgGF4T3vE8NDV1Vy8sZecWSSOzqK8ahiWV2PAxCTowF0h13cIvaBsKOXNh nOWy6jacYiFusumaCyb9xN9JyeRj92Bits9Z2jvsv/jqKFLj84PNGTgCfnv0YNy+xpWv l3FvhyfpPyQJUzKRkEdulC/21l4F1OOXV5vWiyswR0Il1Iq9cy6VaAx6vjY4NY5COXGc Y2YGeZEY6moc9KL2v5INiLilOANsdRkgdzCJR4Kgw5kuk+8JclScwtbKum69TKOpPKKC Val/vUiBK9jfIBiuk9DaOfMmxryCjaAZTfrBEAeCyZO+vGrYCeDVaNkfPIbsX30KFkrs RYeQ== X-Received: by 10.194.5.4 with SMTP id o4mr96477291wjo.40.1367322430074; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fz3sm28464197wib.0.2013.04.30.04.47.09 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:46:58 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: "vivo75@gmail.com" Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? Message-ID: <20130430124658.3e7239a1@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <517FAE1E.1000408@gmail.com> References: <20130429075549.06e8ad66@gentoo.org> <201304291436.42577.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130429194917.46d4985c@googlemail.com> <20862.56778.599974.921136@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130429215950.019cd23b@googlemail.com> <20862.62111.902255.208565@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130429232709.6d755604@googlemail.com> <20130430121213.330244bc@googlemail.com> <517FAE1E.1000408@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/XGqOKeGKm_Kf6sUuCECNuLV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6ed3e23d-e3f3-40af-af37-a7039b75fc2f X-Archives-Hash: 1872effa12242f58cbca3b638735bc70 --Sig_/XGqOKeGKm_Kf6sUuCECNuLV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:42:22 +0200 "vivo75@gmail.com" wrote: > Now, is it possible to alter the behaviour of paludis to act, still > following the specs, in a way compatible with portage and which seem > more logical to the majority of people writing this thread? Sure, and as an added bonus, we can do that selectively from EAPI 6 onwards, avoiding the need to introduce a breaking change to the spec. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/XGqOKeGKm_Kf6sUuCECNuLV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlF/rzgACgkQ96zL6DUtXhFKlACgw/VUznNQ4UB3sUVzxxseFcQL tLwAoNbzKU15qS3Q4JiIpPLVFBgFDacV =avvJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/XGqOKeGKm_Kf6sUuCECNuLV--