From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785321381F3 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:49:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD36CE09DC; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com (mail-wg0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDE48E09D4 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b12so3873889wgh.18 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=HRT6ioQqq/feytRHXSBrmczuCiet1K057RUIhyGiqso=; b=JotPTBwX5ZQH8J7IudeMnriYyoE1c/p8FRpz9m4AYhyUViLJ+ihlzPW8EBfAW00dHn CiJTQwccJjU/bYaV5puUGN+vdmZ3mdX1wZ1cQgXWFEpTouidwx4k4/6sP2dBazaBW4Cs EllWOKpa3ydx0EWy7bLlQhpsBbZwd/iBndZsLFDM0Le482Dc7Jkiq0fBO0PVCaSYcBAI cGyz9DazG+ldsBV08PJpwj1RuMv7zrYh7QrMPQZIcSKPDm/uK0gWNBZioXPl/UBVtn1R 9Q6GtvpMpFJccNxoJLnSL++JqZSq4JNzJW7pYbaUTx+6AOO2X7O9OEyvFOlvrgdNSPqL yZkg== X-Received: by 10.180.183.133 with SMTP id em5mr19736753wic.26.1367261363493; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc13-broo7-2-0-cust130.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [82.9.16.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ge7sm21967673wic.0.2013.04.29.11.49.23 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:49:17 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Shall econf append its arguments to end of ./configure invocation? Message-ID: <20130429194917.46d4985c@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201304291436.42577.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20130429075549.06e8ad66@gentoo.org> <201304291436.42577.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/oConKm=xKUkxP8LWy9An.+L"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4f571f05-015c-4ebe-a868-f2fa002f04b9 X-Archives-Hash: d334a43e9a1991d018fee67ffe2f6e99 --Sig_/oConKm=xKUkxP8LWy9An.+L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:36:41 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 29 April 2013 01:55:49 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > Now, what are your thoughts? Shall we fix PMS to explicitly state > > the argument order or implement ugly hacks in ebuilds? >=20 > portage has always inserted implicit args before the args given by > the ebuild to econf. PMS omitting the ordering information is simply > an oversight to be clarified, not functionality that may be relied > upon. As you can see in the bug, we're not discussing anything related to EAPI 0 behaviour, so this argument is irrelevant. We're discussing a change in a later EAPI, where the change had nothing to say about ordering. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/oConKm=xKUkxP8LWy9An.+L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlF+wLAACgkQ96zL6DUtXhHrAwCeKyMJcfV95r35Ro4gsCGgdyaa k+cAoNNyku/j/nelZl2E7gkcrLhHLfZe =26R2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/oConKm=xKUkxP8LWy9An.+L--