From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB961381F3 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:57:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15F28E0CEC; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30A67E0C2A for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D982E33DD35 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:57:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:57:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20858.42422.774640.252393@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201304261452.09923.vapier@gentoo.org> <20858.54334.173774.722711@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <20858.54334.173774.722711@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5734807.hZv5fuiDGe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304261557.36133.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 79086e61-5a17-47e9-a9e7-b1c0ace7cf8a X-Archives-Hash: ab9156af72bfa9f159fa8637204e245a --nextPart5734807.hZv5fuiDGe Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 26 April 2013 15:23:42 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> Currently RESTRICT=3Dmirror and RESTRICT=3Dbindist are independent of > >> each other. I wonder if the former should imply the latter. > >>=20 > >> Is there any package where the files in SRC_URI cannot be mirrored > >> (i.e., redistributed), but where the built package can be > >> distributed? > >=20 > > i've used RESTRICT=3Dmirror in the past when the files were really > > large (like games or toolchain source tarballs) and upstream already > > had a good mirroring system. in both cases, there was no binary > > redistribution restrictions. > >=20 > > so my answer would be no: we have two independent knobs and let's > > keep them that way. >=20 > Right. And as was pointed to me on IRC, another legitimate case for > mirror restriction are packages in overlays whose distfiles are not on > mirrors. Then it obviously makes no sense to check mirrors for it. ah, yeah, we do this a lot in ChromiumOS =2Dmike --nextPart5734807.hZv5fuiDGe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRetwvAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WByqUP/RHHdnG55Nho1Mgn9UauixyT pr6TSJKJxQlJYI6QTrI4K3Gd7YjF2wQcnIJOFbAYtooB7eA1jDulunuuqdY10HVx lKQTHBgrqvQ3UKa0viZi+QWJqQ7y/cbBa0/QGiRmYuqXwUFBOFwLZuaEXzFdWZHu 6mKPshU3KKsRsMjvYl9KwmIfd2zbOfgO70iz5kO55K0HAfG21vsF+D2yzp3f7WL8 C5tVuYuVLK9a0+geB0xdvPUcEw9+V2BNm2IPacv1S/vQ9dUMjdUQoexEPLy6/knd JYc85V3g6aASR8hUiiGcEoLg4S1MNeAOa45GPku+Rmn5d6bjGUDLTE1OD9BICO5f +uBbErdE5152TJ8/h7QocFJgXfFAs2kMI8a2H1FJgQ/ObGwQbFIT5pw1RdgVSsIn G+bxzjjS/Oj1T6MX9iS+/bD0K7owLlY8f4lugAb1rZDBhVzSd3YsrEDYQRECvXSX AgvRWGK03NKStEXRYLs+Onb/cSjwlZrkulocrMJyovpdFsbYg4e6J1Xbk5F6CVke XDRLJKEyKSZbakg82+pt9Q79oJHj84tQVDmrEd4AwPzN4v6Sz2klKGSVWYLD7SlF bj84OQCfKoMAl/qPeGId1gPxY98g/Nb1RXykj+yejj1y1vxOlH/sY2LxrVx/4cOZ DfkcoEFxsXtKJEZwmBGs =/ZSl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5734807.hZv5fuiDGe--