From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72531381F3 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2470E09A8; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3727E094C for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC90D33D876 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:52:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:52:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20858.42422.774640.252393@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <20858.42422.774640.252393@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1908471.MjZscMEtTr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304261452.09923.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1a4a63f9-bd0b-461d-9d0c-ab68993d9929 X-Archives-Hash: 758fcf71babfe84341ce620fcee5ca02 --nextPart1908471.MjZscMEtTr Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday 26 April 2013 12:05:10 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Currently RESTRICT=3Dmirror and RESTRICT=3Dbindist are independent of each > other. I wonder if the former should imply the latter. >=20 > Is there any package where the files in SRC_URI cannot be mirrored > (i.e., redistributed), but where the built package can be distributed? i've used RESTRICT=3Dmirror in the past when the files were really large (l= ike=20 games or toolchain source tarballs) and upstream already had a good mirrori= ng=20 system. in both cases, there was no binary redistribution restrictions. so my answer would be no: we have two independent knobs and let's keep them= =20 that way. =2Dmike --nextPart1908471.MjZscMEtTr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJReszZAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB6VwP/iginzqyNa01R/xA0Lef79AE pHdZWIviQehnELsu51aX1IT4i6z+ReNDcvAz0YgYMYxaZM6IWH+qZTh+eCSBj1md VKD+mDk6slWbhzYx8jBChylYu78ZPagaH/w2G5JUjI5BNClz7ZBJlWuvyJxUsf1V yEGxYSOx3EqxAP1K/grlHEC8BIr+gJdi+4UIhA1w4Jxc4ju28qIB0QbOXWkfX6oE 9MyYWefKq0bWprd/FO3tlhEFFSeD4w1x0nUB42019XNURoXQWyKv7Bz4uNGCSgTf z2bVNQq2VClUvpFRNJnwOa4xUChOn5BpIbzbUx8wXSXGQ+m2q9QsvTTiU0+jk2bm GWFDRb7ilqnpPntwt8JJ8h7pqM4gewsR5bK00jryRdJ1iR+vP7DxlIWHjXm3vda/ cYdmQUZjWv/BScSZqZn0oEZ1Im4ljGO3UYxVkbQP7F0ckcxDIOitFk8Ile4MaPCP C311lht7VOu4Af6J7/X2E0I/qQAQQs/X16lxyRTjI0OyqnYXiD6iFjSFpM+4JI3F f+iia5SXwQtgz4APl9+FUj4ZPG5UIZDzks3Ult3q6n7CepYJsPvowJU0PtT5Z276 YPk8VsQ5leWg3GHDrJvCwOSNdhFaATF4VkyZF2Gs/FPOgBlNHTlxhtVr5U16F7Yk u9mJXnY1VNykNetRhwyj =v8OF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1908471.MjZscMEtTr--