From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction?
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:52:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201304261452.09923.vapier@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20858.42422.774640.252393@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 669 bytes --]
On Friday 26 April 2013 12:05:10 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Currently RESTRICT=mirror and RESTRICT=bindist are independent of each
> other. I wonder if the former should imply the latter.
>
> Is there any package where the files in SRC_URI cannot be mirrored
> (i.e., redistributed), but where the built package can be distributed?
i've used RESTRICT=mirror in the past when the files were really large (like
games or toolchain source tarballs) and upstream already had a good mirroring
system. in both cases, there was no binary redistribution restrictions.
so my answer would be no: we have two independent knobs and let's keep them
that way.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-26 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-26 16:05 [gentoo-dev] Should mirror restriction imply bindist restriction? Ulrich Mueller
2013-04-26 16:15 ` Peter Stuge
2013-04-26 16:21 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-26 16:56 ` Jeroen Roovers
2013-04-26 17:14 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-26 17:15 ` Jeroen Roovers
2013-04-26 18:30 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-26 18:44 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-26 19:07 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-26 19:24 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-04-26 19:35 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-26 19:43 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-04-26 19:53 ` Rich Freeman
2013-04-26 17:19 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2013-04-26 21:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2013-04-26 18:52 ` Mike Frysinger [this message]
2013-04-26 19:23 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ulrich Mueller
2013-04-26 19:55 ` Michael Weber
2013-04-26 19:57 ` Mike Frysinger
2013-04-26 21:22 ` Alec Warner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201304261452.09923.vapier@gentoo.org \
--to=vapier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox