On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:

> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
> 
> > "Having functional changes mixed with whitespace/cosmetics in a single
> >  commit makes it hard to read and understand."
> > 
> >> Also, in this case I see only one extra hunk.
> >> But once we have proper tools (like git) we can revisit this.
> > 
> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs
> > commit twice with cvs.
> 
> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already pointed 
> out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything but.
> 
> So at least in the sense that it'll be less hassle, two git commits 
> followed by a push should be much easier than two repoman and cvs commits.

Just to make it clear -- there are four CVS commits. Ebuild commit
followed by GPG-signed Manifest commit. Hopefully the developer has
persistent SSH connections set up.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny