From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59790-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A68F1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D547E0A6D;
	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:00:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C031E09B5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from marga.jer-c2.orkz.net (D4B2706A.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [212.178.112.106])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: jer)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E25233C1EE
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:00:56 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:00:53 +0200
From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86
 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask
Message-ID: <20130423200053.77ed8b49@marga.jer-c2.orkz.net>
In-Reply-To: <pan$1e4f5$800158e2$35c423dd$7f617b73@cox.net>
References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org>
	<20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable>
	<CAB9SyzRq-RuMUU0cXnWYC_+-yv3FSJ=fDw335QmUrqQinsbzQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130421170549.41cfea49@portable>
	<CAB9SyzQ7f6145adfAcZgMVhdKWBjCHPsVSV-nTOCQbx7rt1PSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130422154033.65a68a40@portable>
	<pan$1e4f5$800158e2$35c423dd$7f617b73@cox.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 204a2e60-4694-4f89-af47-123298269374
X-Archives-Hash: 05f9c758dbea53c53b1611f4a1779f57

On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:46:14 +0000 (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:

> Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 22 Apr 2013 15:40:33 +0200 as excerpted:
> > I don't see how git helps. You'll have to commit twice then push, vs
> > commit twice with cvs.
> 
> But git commits are quite lightweight, while as someone already
> pointed out, cvs commits, if done properly with repoman, are anything
> but.

Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.


      jer