From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BFD1381F3 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25596E0A44; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 272BEE09F7 for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-254-76-26.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.76.26]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF49333DD93; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:29:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:13:38 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: yngwin@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask Message-ID: <20130422191338.6c71482b@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20130419091632.D01152171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <20130419153043.30ffc50c@portable> <5173F9F7.6050100@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/ogQ1s/vUCjYIq+vEjTxxdCs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 5b010d0c-df2c-4578-8219-fa16333533fe X-Archives-Hash: a0e236f3d6f16ad588bade0788c99009 --Sig_/ogQ1s/vUCjYIq+vEjTxxdCs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:43:22 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 21 April 2013 22:38, Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: >=20 > > Denis Dupeyron schrieb: > > > I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not > > > propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being > > > actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not touch > > > it without talking to that person or team first. > > > > I fail to see any wrong behavior here. A bug report was created and a > > review > > of the changes was requested. The first reaction came after several wee= ks > > after the bug filing, and the first objection almost two months after t= he > > change was applied. > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D455074 > > >=20 > You are missing an important part of the story. > See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D455070 where we discuss > the same issue for freetype. (Yes I should have been explicit for fontcon= fig > too, my bad.) >=20 > I initially reacted within hours, saying that his proposal was in my eyes > not ready yet. I assumed I was clear enough in my refusal, but > apparently Micha=C5=82 didn't understand it that way. He then contacted > the herd a few weeks later, when I was on holiday, and got Luca's permiss= ion > to commit, not taking into account he hadn't touched those packages in > many years. Just to be clear -- I misunderstood you indeed. I thought you mean that you would agree if the idea is discussed and the discussion results in a general agreement on proceeding with the solution. > After I found out, I was a bit pissed off about it, but I was too busy wi= th > work to deal with it (and thought it wise to cool down a bit before taking > action). I then saw bug reports about the freetype multilib ebuild revisi= on > flooding in, and was satisfied after it got masked. Those bugs weren't relevant to the final version of the ebuild which you have masked. The only actual bug left open was the one which I forgot to close after fixing it instantly after it was opened. So please don't say that I don't take responsibility for my changes. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/ogQ1s/vUCjYIq+vEjTxxdCs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRdW/GXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEK20EQAL6gT6YZd/A3KsNpUnBM5zzQ JrsRZ+yvRjLAFW8vXOZ2Q2aX391qI1WTu/SG6tT+vfalpF1yZ3UF3xGFqLfgWqd0 wLVfJjtO5aUE4ZgYcwc3UrgQ/J9JWW6gSwAiq1hNveNtBFgly3c+8WR9tZhDTJc/ tWbO1RAXQM8UCyUJxL64M8YJKJEbLrZf9ZKaNbARAC27si6pchdkSk8HVb6BqpTp n78XDitDCbeKNyfhU1kcmw2Vj/zEUaisFlzXZSNl0E10Ty+sIU/rOVCNuZWZF8bx 5NQM4v54vgQUcq03atmazUtEzibnSONNkzJMspFa583tK3JDNeTh4wpGWNFC9ZNn AO3VCAHS+11vJopAieJ5vqWsHGJAKb79uv1naeILICRfnAD0L/7yN6pkr5trBX1d OTOy/hu1iKHAf7kFwBliaen/AD2CvlAg/eWWLnpaTBWBoMholrAAqMkqp1bHlxCV EtYQNSyvufJbOGs3yMvIekluue38+2vK3Joc2Lyn1oZBXhQtGXFc0XtRZ/bnoyBp kJnIspiQe39yhBjEZXxdoBPTXhqujmoeCTd2FiVPZBSVYAKQkX0HXZYru8NMe3b9 sWcsvz+jbY1DjuDRDS62LBwil7kr4w1911H3k/UTEqd/Im2WXc1JZaDHa77LI2Zl aCvn1GjI+MvWi+MMYmv8 =4tco -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ogQ1s/vUCjYIq+vEjTxxdCs--