From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CA41381F3 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:27:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C76E0B17; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F053E09BD for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DDB33DE10 for ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:27:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Support recursive operation in edos2unix. Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:29:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <1365864260-1606-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20130414124640.667de0e3@pomiocik.lan> <20130414112626.6222.qmail@stuge.se> In-Reply-To: <20130414112626.6222.qmail@stuge.se> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart26288642.C9CEnHeUZZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304171429.25741.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: cacf7242-fc93-4dcd-b15b-f90af1c4fe21 X-Archives-Hash: ed78e9834e2edd6ff8304abe8bb1e15f --nextPart26288642.C9CEnHeUZZ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 14 April 2013 07:26:26 Peter Stuge wrote: > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > > Any thoughts? > > >=20 > > > If doing this at all I think it should take an -r option to enable > > > the new recursion, for symmetry with the do* functions and for > > > backwards compatibility. > >=20 > > Backwards compatibility with what? >=20 > With the old non-recursive behavior of edos2unix that could only > operate on a single file. >=20 > Arguably, all old users *should* have refered to single files, but I > would still prefer adding a -r just to be sure to avoid collateral > damage. if you run the current edos2unix on a dir, it'll fail. so i don't think=20 backwards compat is a big worry here. =2Dmike --nextPart26288642.C9CEnHeUZZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRbuoFAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBVjUQAMw7mCNsk89K0g7klDHURvXQ Xjwei4ifO8xb2Fg3Y2yrou2CUl+rhAnz3gX/yj6imibI9HJcwD/Fd4RL5XpyXd3p HOk4/CvTKwgZqs5aw8lz9kh5pc5oha7kIRXS0o4+pbw3r8rvlxxQ/PFXZ+pP9wdI vE2wD3SuZbC8BwSI7btq5DMLowG5y1kMp1YY1XG3S7KoWACMXXK8bpbMBE+dK7Hf lJPrcqbDpkKjtuUsrQHc43ubN9ut+Nf5rsQJcNwByaRANWU+zMWJ4R/2C+g+haGi pXAl+MG/NhYdY8NEHFepz9iARFSxCytgRwsU9Zy0uUkmA+OwfZxR1I6BzrgAznYg W+bIGuJ/9Wt6op2OoNi3tH8NxMBfzlEjV65Gv2CugiqOLYShypaguw7z/43behM/ hc0z/0RE2b+nJMIpf73scN09Ld9JlN5/LCcquq0yFh7QZYJhl07GThTNcifjuvth IngGnKqfWWjsmXJFVea3Pk9dSnZ0qrF5OM3VYay7QznX5ldb4/cxGkSCruxDoXxF FrsWVISzRjEQex654BhR5u7t8BKIRy8AEY9jDgfWm13paA81QssW1O8BxYPMJCS2 hylyVMfT0+gqxIy/8OJ/QbxPlkD5bCMwm0MK0x/TrJfI7ocKCcibndTjGU30CF48 l69vOkuACoWV/lFtNHTJ =1Ogw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart26288642.C9CEnHeUZZ--