From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-59663-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BCE1381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:26:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00B54E0A01;
	Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:26:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from foo.stuge.se (foo.stuge.se [212.116.89.98])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0520E09B5
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 11:26:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 6223 invoked by uid 501); 14 Apr 2013 11:26:26 -0000
Message-ID: <20130414112626.6222.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:26:26 +0200
From: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH eutils] Support recursive operation in
	edos2unix.
Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1365864260-1606-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20130414103705.1744.qmail@stuge.se> <20130414124640.667de0e3@pomiocik.lan>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9hshNW4m6zn79FF/"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130414124640.667de0e3@pomiocik.lan>
X-Archives-Salt: 767070c7-c274-49fc-8840-b868b6ac9581
X-Archives-Hash: e5af1e153fee3d624b9ea03641be35d4


--9hshNW4m6zn79FF/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote:
> > > Any thoughts?
> >=20
> > If doing this at all I think it should take an -r option to enable
> > the new recursion, for symmetry with the do* functions and for
> > backwards compatibility.
>=20
> Backwards compatibility with what?

With the old non-recursive behavior of edos2unix that could only
operate on a single file.

Arguably, all old users *should* have refered to single files, but I
would still prefer adding a -r just to be sure to avoid collateral
damage.


//Peter

--9hshNW4m6zn79FF/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFRapJihR3Q0dhIfEgRAsAvAJoCZyljo1yKBHqKFW6XI/WIe/rUVgCffYlz
vFFIe5NX5GCYeAgDSBhK4dU=
=OP5P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9hshNW4m6zn79FF/--