From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E371381F3 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48FB1E08B2; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEEEE0897 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:22:19 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (jorabe mo26) (RZmta 31.26 AUTH) with ESMTPA id t02dadp3E7iNCv for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:22:02 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing? Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:23:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <20130412234105.407563f4@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130414085539.7501576a@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> <20130414022418.45e1ed85@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> In-Reply-To: <20130414022418.45e1ed85@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart682994872.PEmNRH45cU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304141023.05880.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: c07e1a19-fb0d-42ad-875d-52354cf211b3 X-Archives-Hash: 9ed473bc5dbb57cdda89497a193b1bf7 --nextPart682994872.PEmNRH45cU Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sonntag, 14. April 2013, 10:24:18 schrieb Ryan Hill: > > Personally I think that the entire idea of only displaying messages on the > first install is completely asinine. What exactly is the benefit? Were > users complaining that we were being too helpful and they'd like us to > hide important messages in random places? No. They are just not reading it when the only new and relevant message is= =20 drowned in repetitive spam. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart682994872.PEmNRH45cU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJRamdpXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOc9fsP/3ozOhM7otkG0ZR6F8/oi+Dy c+t2Nus1WmS8m/Vh0n8f37RMO0AQwE1rYmg7vm7h9zcSvRR88Z56fJQMzMOyRj0v /Kf4X0eAjrnYPU86OHM7gYPPf1S1yX5RZFTR7LJXhVarUoCQRVbALooR8GstqrCj R6RxhzZ231OZOSCPO4Nb4FSRaujPXYnM+xQHFzVTxkQyf4RyZEfywNTin4SsLMJA GjRuCl8U7cjQtq1VrWobSpCg8UJeNVpj8yHRBXFtZX3ILyYgJ+nrtFPGDO0yOiNi U2m9R42B0t0tbmbKOVT+ci0vcdBUS+BojCKqgggzah/ZDWNhbONUe4uF6I9VTVSE 6fYpPpnj2QF2SZQX8DgoqLsyudiA71Fv0nCevTeDj3bRH+Hw1g4lmoy8VxMyvGzk TSbF/180yNZVAxvh0Rvpi/eHZH7uNCxrA2sF+6mcHumvA/0H7a1rqUYxv1ECerXh P6Wg4kH26S7jMgBQVgDF9uu2kcfuByF84ABC3gS9MwZ2IpTiUxcFnK2asCNzkllJ f5kGp5l4/ks7Ot8Jgv6FmzY6AbcYflC2bzWJKU+BipqXjY94jLTjH5vd9A166JZl lKC+aS6vh7K5NhMazl+3qLTG0YulAg5u/lhV3+xwcfFpHodfbMcM2Qz18SFJaYqy EXgX7Oeurgh4w3qq1CtD =TzwL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart682994872.PEmNRH45cU--