From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A001381F3 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 00:49:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 698E4E0ACA; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 00:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com (mail-qa0-f43.google.com [209.85.216.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8802DE0A93 for ; Sun, 14 Apr 2013 00:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bs12so178778qab.9 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:49:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=h4aTTXwA5o+ISHC2zFvku2TfRZkgFVrI+VqE60rDGgw=; b=tuhe51y0uul67NGWsshwCvzszjR7uPhFB9ClN8aQVqndapvLxsmk8Q9Eg1sAxAY1sy 8/Nr+d60OfCzo4fr5FAvgP4yTX7xf6UWf5Z6AYYY3uSEbFCRtgYtsTkw0TjZ0UJqvzYm 1lXNsy8DZd8XYXhqNZf/NdJa9dsidUdFefokjb03AEDRO8ixMJaAkGp1dMtKa9z1fqdM fPXsCLaA2zb/6Ez5QGF1Lc6xC3SZ2qxJfWxzUuerlvLlWHhGXgxi+aSuIBPLCKLVZHJN WzikmRcLvYKIeZ/KYtyiqrbrVmRuGoYitmwNie6BCis1aQz0d+q0dI3oBuFJMc3D224Z NFhw== X-Received: by 10.224.41.146 with SMTP id o18mr17467309qae.5.1365900571501; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bt19sm23493340qab.0.2013.04.13.17.49.27 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 17:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:49:26 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 19:49:26 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ssuominen@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: systemd-next.eclass Message-ID: <20130414004926.GA32023@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, ssuominen@gentoo.org References: <20130413194314.GA31253@linux1> <20130413232724.07c19b9a@pomiocik.lan> <20130413213036.GA31703@linux1> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 8ed674de-743a-4037-9a61-76287b716e5e X-Archives-Hash: d5564244831c20a2172d2c5348c60667 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:41:59AM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 13 April 2013 22:30, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > >> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500 > >> William Hubbs wrote: > >> > >> > this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains > >> > full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can qu= ery > >> > pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths= as > >> > systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig. > >> > >> Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd > >> A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching > >> set of packages? > >> > >> If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply > >> your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really > >> want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You > >> don't really have to play silly games like this. > > > > Ok, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass. > > > > Thanks much. :-) > > > > William > > >=20 > Am I the only one wondering why you didn't discuss this before you > submit a new eclass for review? I'm answering this on the list here for completeness only. I feel like a question here calls for a response. This started with this thread [1], where I proposed a patch to the systemd eclass. That patch was rejected as you can see with no real explanation from mgorny. This lead to private discussions with him which did not go well. I have all of those emails still, so I will go back and see if I can find where he gave me the explanation he is claiming here, but I honestly do not remember any such explanation coming from him until now. My original patch has been accepted now, so that should take care of that part of the situation. Mgorny, thanks for working with me. :-) William [1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/269385?page=3Dlast --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFp/RYACgkQblQW9DDEZTjXdgCdGj6kebQDCBZTPpWidz0F5wL1 T2AAmwYBjUaFs/fdkDsD1AazIFVyCQiJ =Sa5/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb--