From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D952A1381F3 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 21:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAA77E0B62; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 21:30:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-f41.google.com (mail-qe0-f41.google.com [209.85.128.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F4BE0AA2 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 21:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b10so2135113qen.28 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:30:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pwp/b8VNbwn22qrTkse97HmpZnXAlVuvq+4IsnO0JaE=; b=dpYES5c+uGWRlTJ4arvIrWjIUwe4oB0sie9rwRzBk26D3NnSmUWG/TT7YGIa4xblRS 8krFeIldL7VlQ/ysnUWCAeDVXPRZ+snRAtD0Wo4ElEYPmvDIv9V0fXILvDOFj7Dnppfj 9FagQPrly92T97/zAhGykQRmhDdPZEY2/8nQHirObpc5ZBJfvu7ZPdM6BpNxuJ2tuDQ1 tkrDPO48+xfYJOKnzKFV+oJQhgW6IlOu5YBrkUuzP9Dcx53Zvjdjt262iCSUT1nDAzPT vi5XyEJ85fuJeNyuEJf1RvU3njf9OA5Gl7ej58+bh8bh+iMQHMhOYsWLjL7X7CKHiQ1n J1fQ== X-Received: by 10.229.6.193 with SMTP id a1mr6408385qca.14.1365888641126; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm22513136qax.13.2013.04.13.14.30.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:30:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 16:30:36 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: systemd-next.eclass Message-ID: <20130413213036.GA31703@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20130413194314.GA31253@linux1> <20130413232724.07c19b9a@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130413232724.07c19b9a@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: b0e51c5f-b381-440b-853b-ebc3d16f7929 X-Archives-Hash: b26c7c6508cdb420b1210a0b87f2f5a2 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500 > William Hubbs wrote: >=20 > > this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains > > full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can query > > pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths as > > systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig. >=20 > Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd > A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching > set of packages? >=20 > If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply > your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really > want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You > don't really have to play silly games like this. Ok, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass. Thanks much. :-) William --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFpznEACgkQblQW9DDEZThXBgCglBHtWejW4P/nRXxrnXrw2SM1 evkAn37TisRGLY2mf4pS+2SJGQxdx537 =uRrm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--