Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: systemd-next.eclass

[William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]

On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:27:24PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 14:43:14 -0500
> William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > this eclass is an alternative to systemd.eclass, and maintains
> > full compatibility with it; however, it expands it so that it can query
> > pkgconfig for the directory paths. It returns the same default paths as
> > systemd.eclass if there is an error with pkgconfig.
> 
> Alternative? So now developers decide whether they want support systemd
> A or systemd B? And we fork packages so that users can have matching
> set of packages?
> 
> If you listened, you would know that the only reason I didn't apply
> your patches to the eclass was that nothing used them. If you really
> want to commit your quasi-fork, I will update the eclass. You
> don't really have to play silly games like this.

Ok, that is the better aproach anyway, go ahead and update the eclass.

Thanks much. :-)

William


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]