From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B571381F3 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53AFCE0A60; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F75EE0A4A for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987BF33DE43; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:47:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: James Cloos Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc: pt_chown setuid going away by default Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:49:00 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <201304100115.53431.vapier@gentoo.org> <201304101532.41246.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2908545.0XMtdR5HtQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304111249.01381.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1c568330-ae9e-48f3-a7d3-066a2719a2b5 X-Archives-Hash: 23734c42331640d5a5e9ebd55b106f12 --nextPart2908545.0XMtdR5HtQ Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 11 April 2013 11:43:59 James Cloos wrote: > >>>>> "MF" =3D=3D Mike Frysinger writes: > MF> this should impact very few (if any) > MF> users, so i don't think a news item makes sense. >=20 > It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5). don't do that. delete the line. > I doubt that any say gid=3D5. >=20 > I don't remember why this box has it in fstab; it looks like it always di= d. >=20 > The backup of my (now dead) laptop also has such an entry. The rcs log > for that one shows that it got added in late '03, and not manually. baselayout has not included devpts in /etc/fstab since 26 Nov 2001 and even then, it was commented out http://sources.gentoo.org/baselayout/branches/baselayout-1_12/etc/fstab?vie= w=3Dlog http://sources.gentoo.org/baselayout/branches/rc- scripts-1_6/etc/fstab?view=3Dlog the oldest tag we have is baselayout-1.11.15 (released 22 Apr 2006), and it doesn't include it. the oldest tarball i have is baselayout-1.11.8 (released 15 Dec 2004) as that's when i took over releasing things, and it doesn't include it either. it hasn't been added since that release. so i stand by my statement that very few people will be impacted by this. =2Dmike --nextPart2908545.0XMtdR5HtQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRZul9AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBz3AP/1Sejd4MbKEwUFu8BZoVm1/w SsDfnE6SgZXbyubmSMKuELS/qq+EKpUhQdu2gkULIhAvhXoccFyTxcZROZQgf5S0 lvBOQeTwUEXFz7MHkEnyCXCIaWqz1Hqk72+Hm6c2K9Jh/pHenam/Sni/rcMfHmVH h9FCLiaorr6RbXDJt2Qu89/nUAuhVjonysK1r/ZGaHxBsMWfbwg4ECYLSvy7AV3b TfiZEuJ2y/6RY3SR7FiTBof/MS9heezvi6uOScUq9Y0VU/HQ9gCnhHpc1w/iiiKx sqhHwUTyySiEPzTcjHgD954vDow1BdDE7QVOfBaJ6E4iaYa/cjp7QP5mNrJXcPIw 0a+urADIA33T1Wf0ZkY7XAVo5rBGAgMSw6yvACzBRNdLfeIkd4YNqQA6Plv1C9Gk 3HFDxqGgaw9k3CDDM8iBYhVC4TGc7mZ6dru98JCd+Cl6pjzMF2/0nmYKBEYN2+2m 72Y/KOVs4tnuyiYKCdh+6Qn8xi6sad89QYvfiK2t4PT5LOEfcPkEgGRJYE4qxVg8 tVGZGDP57XCyawF/zSV70RoWqGLFUWKY8cAocJQOKchxTsUxcqdy1IzILGZwGpKn kGJDBD6QENECrCiY4MmfgGMU9niwRspv3EYoi2lhVC/jmfl2BaQoweIcQ5/wU+P/ +tuqCtgOaJk5MQ0SpzUL =+DBt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2908545.0XMtdR5HtQ--