From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F95F1381F3 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F29D8E0A7E; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21F5E09F6 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (173-160-116-182-Minnesota.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.160.116.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dberkholz) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BA9533BF45; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:31:39 -0500 From: Donnie Berkholz To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: phajdan.jr@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Establishing Gentoo patch policy to keep our patches consistent and clean Message-ID: <20130409193139.GB10952@comet.hsd1.mn.comcast.net> References: <20130406200843.6831c4fe@pomiocik.lan> <51607144.5040003@gentoo.org> <20130406214127.52b4b500@pomiocik.lan> <51607EE3.1050005@gentoo.org> <20130406234133.4d9227e9@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130406234133.4d9227e9@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: aa4ad106-b6bf-4e9c-aba0-cb84882e9736 X-Archives-Hash: 465769c0a275a0d798298e7877e88e37 --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 23:41 Sat 06 Apr , Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > Optionally, after the last paragraph you can add a few lines with tags > in form of 'Tag: value'. AFAICS git itself uses only > 'Signed-off-by' but you can find more tags in various 'submitting > patches' docs. >=20 > 'Signed-off-by' lists the one responsible for the patch. Some upstreams > require that line, some take over authorship of patches if you don't > add it (like X.org), some just hate it :). >=20 > The X.org wiki lists also 'Fixes' for bugtracker URL [2] and a few tags > for reviewing patches [3] (those are probably not useful for us). This is the part that would be most useful to document more. Suggesting=20 which tags would be valuable to include. Fixes, Reviewed-by,=20 Signed-off-by, etc. --=20 Thanks, Donnie Donnie Berkholz Council Member / Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux Analyst, RedMonk --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlFkbJsACgkQXVaO67S1rts1NQCg+sHtMWKI9KOGWfDjUX82Ylsy NnQAoKyluHYQ9QGEOxzyysFCUZ1Zc+qa =Ki0/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc--