From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1FF138010 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78A3AE0B1A; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ia0-f179.google.com (mail-ia0-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4E1BE0AEE for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 14:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x24so1330103iak.24 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:47:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3ZaDjqa79cnuR/qs4F09yDkQtYVej3mFsq33Edsa08o=; b=XvsTjVl4+E6CqJINI2mUeRSyXcgqtE3gm7q7/V5dUuAY9gmrdivnXzB6Zj6JJ0HDDP zmHJX84AlhoNQwI9eAf8twhjCg+VHsvLE0Jysvad3r374SikeJRYdhhgf2Mq2MhNqz2v CM+zIjLkazVCCpFcH3CaServ+sOudc/9i7Vstwvx2u4Nsf9BGSlTrVGAVeY19OuO5zCE 9ydOyKZbUB6IXV8/k1au1ajDtrevLnSdB+t52sUQbiU3vCpedcJpxuldxzysdyB5lDfR 4d1naJnN4fqYqqEv106anISCXz7GHydJRAnPCnowEN5EXG8XteaSHQ3zmacodWBqAdbZ kbhQ== X-Received: by 10.42.29.198 with SMTP id s6mr1044297icc.54.1365000475837; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:47:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hi4sm4670090igc.6.2013.04.03.07.47.52 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:47:51 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:47:51 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? Message-ID: <20130403144751.GA16883@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20130403111437.4c1e0aa6@pomiocik.lan> <20130403115609.68282afe@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130403115609.68282afe@pomiocik.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 5f476445-9a97-42cc-af2c-4e4998e72d63 X-Archives-Hash: 2630c9702cfe37f354f423d77495f459 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 11:56:09AM +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > There was a slight mis-understanding between me and ulm. >=20 > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:14:37 +0200 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > a) patch files can be specified directly or through a directory > > in which *all* files will be applied in lexical order, >=20 > Correction: files which match '*.patch' and '*.diff'. This avoids > catching 'README' files, 'series' files and any reasonable kind > of backup files. I like src_patch. William --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlFcQRcACgkQblQW9DDEZTidvgCeObj7BwOjcpG7v2ARThL/Ik3H 2akAn0lGIvP9bG4IBj28HZzTK7Q4TmRT =oq0q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--