From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766A138010 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F0643E08BB; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17907E08A8 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:46:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-60-160.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.60.160]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF1CC33DC0A; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 20:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:46:56 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hwoarang@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Question about developer/bug assigned person's mail adress (as seen in Bug #453778) Message-ID: <20130402224656.115943e1@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <515B3E7A.6060504@gmx.net> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/COJ5DzSECZ4QYSE1/Yx19i3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: acf527dd-0c10-4a30-95ee-db7a76269935 X-Archives-Hash: f5674eb2d94b42c00973513d98895489 --Sig_/COJ5DzSECZ4QYSE1/Yx19i3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 21:37:45 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > On Apr 2, 2013 9:24 PM, "Martin Dummer" wrote: > > Bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D453778 is assigned to > > "Dustin Polke" > > > > While the bug is easy to fix and close, no action happens. > > So I tried to find out whats the meaning of this strange email address. > > > > After a visit to https://spamgourmet.com/ this mail address means that > > only the first 20 emails send to this address are forwarded to the > > registered user's real mail address. Any further mails are discarded. > > > > Now my question: is this a good behaviour for a developer? > > > > What's your opinion? >=20 > The developer is active he just does not need a working e-mail address. In my opinion every developer *should* have a working e-mail address. Imagine that someone might want to mail him -- it's really impolite to provide a fake address which will drop all incoming mail silently. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/COJ5DzSECZ4QYSE1/Yx19i3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRW0PAXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKVCIQAN2fHB1REXZKZFFMI8uUuM2C jzmOtSI7ChewpbRFHUMsBNWkOwn4p87cmIvrCaR4QZlmgnvfpQ4Lm7oq7tEKxoCM Y5z7q7ohxRRRQYplVqiypDAPUBESXVG0BFCYFc95vsV/SFekoTxq1dYJktUWd79E oQ4E4XEglUS19YWI+oUvbVN+RigiRCcASn97ZPIIJbtriry19DmewEeQKwNshfXc wr9/+99XQyuDvDYkUjtwYk5zqfLB7fv5smJkjuSzazUJQWKM3yBZEp8HDW7bYlB2 pSzSojXhHCOq05L+Qn7a1ce2hNEmTEqDdcpf5+Fv0bYS+6hZ5Sp9mGT64xJwS2Yh c6UZLgQ1q64wOtwydMBg4V1MA5/qp0cMRZwl4Te4X9XukgLDabD9C3Jk0h5gfj98 vm0YuCmyw8jMzluBpaXWeKRyWdU7YOe6J2aVMA9A5jFZMCTFdUVHUB3eqLJAWPBr JEsNKWaiP8Hm0TsPehtxO9UBz7+rAwWzbDBQ3hGirmSgQQ15oqF8VqdcxbA9v1ph YmUq6ysVtJMFYoEOLCebjS5JXoF+QdxhBRNqKSNai7tar+sBvNA0qzHeNkuvTysp UNjpggeDc889290MCILc+3V8uSYkL2euUpK6koHItQenILbx85vdEE/fL/gEEDuI PCxSwR/4kEoWxQO3CBgR =Fh3b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/COJ5DzSECZ4QYSE1/Yx19i3--