Re: [gentoo-dev] bash-3.1 stable

[Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>]

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:01:08 +0100
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Here we go again. Fine, keep arguing about the really important
> question "why old X is in the tree when new X is stable".

Nobody besides that part of the thread is arguing about anything like
that. If you are upset about the endless debates on treecleaning,
then I'm sorry for you but I was not part of any of them and didn't
even read them. I believe you are interpreting what I wrote under this
perspective: I seriously don't care if bash 3.1 goes away, it's been a
while since I've not had it installed on any box. You seem to be
thinking the contrary.

> Did anyone actually consider to ask the maintainers instead of opening
> a public debate on this? I guess no, because
> bikeshedding in the mailing list is so much better.

Did you even check if my first reply to this thread was not complete
BS ? I didn't.

Alexis.