From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC21138010 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EA78E0AFF; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1A1E0AF7 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portable (AMontpellier-651-1-308-49.w92-133.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.133.67.49]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC4DF33DBBD; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 10:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:59:43 +0200 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: mgorny@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Header wrapping support for multilib Message-ID: <20130402125943.4ded3b1f@portable> In-Reply-To: <20130401111951.451ca58f@pomiocik.lan> References: <20130323172532.1b1100e2@pomiocik.lan> <20130401111951.451ca58f@pomiocik.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 2c6522b7-27c7-4117-bb33-2e6ec17f69ae X-Archives-Hash: 7b45f8529c3737407a314b4338be6bab On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 11:19:51 +0200 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:25:32 +0100 > Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > I've finally got around to writing the header wrapping functions for > > multilib. That's an initial yet working draft. I will send patches > > in reply to this mail. >=20 > Committed. >=20 Thanks. Sorry for not keeping up with the discussions, I was very busy last week. Some comments: - I would have put the template in a separate file for better clarity but I guess having it online in the eclass is more error-proof. - Header wrapping really has nothing to do with autotools and I strongly believe this should be moved to multilib-build. Alexis.