From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A94B138010 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 18ED6E0E71; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C25E0E71 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2013 22:42:44 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (josoe mo11) (RZmta 31.23 AUTH) with ESMTPA id 00346dp31KpGFx for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:42:38 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflags zeroconf and avahi Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 00:43:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.10.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <201304012359.03703.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <515A09EF.5000003@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <515A09EF.5000003@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2194435.8jqk1O4kEH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304020043.32152.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 45095267-357b-4031-90e3-01eb9dab4269 X-Archives-Hash: 95409807d5488cc362853e073258ddf8 --nextPart2194435.8jqk1O4kEH Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Dienstag, 2. April 2013, 00:27:59 schrieb Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Ngu= y=E1=BB=85n: > > I would like to suggest unifying use-flag usage, and use "zeroconf" > > anywhere. >=20 > Sounds good. Do you think the same should apply to non-mDNS/DNS-SD based > zeroconf like UPnP/SSDP? No idea to be honest... :| opinions? =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart2194435.8jqk1O4kEH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJRWg2UXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOcdp0QAKd3fG2i+10IBhH5HbGuN1+U DI3zYBzwafPNVsMvYJoYqaPhKYD707JkyPdZuHlwsop22CWxFdQDIgnpGDw3ej18 WMUtn1lUX1E+wdsQe3Tvw8dX97g+x88AWRGY5IWWU1R8VN8NdI0PG8G4mKWfkjfg 2mHx941zPYf5DVW3dyQ9rOLqX7nSPsOk1lkApWkkyZcU7yUMqHzYCAZzugCOi2Rs TFlQqmuJEf4LODpa0JXlnVKF8KUG99kZ2MMNy0yYkLO3PZShDeZf9f1YQZJmSyFc KwCS3uZhYVhdhPCzxCUeoz8Q9ZbSL55KtXZKpN4mYNoqCtif05phD2jnvJxr720p mkywaJsUhfSGV2iuJtp2L/UZgZotibgIMddEzOQuvt/zjWdnlmyG8BjkFAD+dOkF BdhZdvvhJYWSyd5t55YuDYUFmaZPyMua7LnUDwXPmkzlgOCZYR5PvVek80/Vbh2r uhK+SQLkNhnRtRZLZhcfO1sdXzbFl/XSEToiMRIw1NMZqmKmMUoveiUdQ+C8tK1j 7TMKJPO8hs5mwXixIzwsx4szUbPcDpT8Xo4Upgk+mYkda4wcPIgSiA+zpU7eQShu liS1vAtIMV4qaet4qq/nCl+tE0WXURfEuwfO3d8M/cZsPZwKVUW7zGPx62FtYZTe Dy7bF6vSipvzfUeLZhIf =7ZV9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2194435.8jqk1O4kEH--