From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BFE198005 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C53E066B; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC941E039A for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [83.238.59.230]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA36133DB59; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:32:08 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: flameeyes@flameeyes.eu Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] Header wrapping support for multilib Message-ID: <20130323183208.4a58f4eb@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <514DDC5A.5040308@flameeyes.eu> References: <20130323172532.1b1100e2@pomiocik.lan> <514DDC5A.5040308@flameeyes.eu> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/deSJvf_yIghQhAgt52JVA9d"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: fb4f58c0-8b7a-4266-899a-3ae035f840c4 X-Archives-Hash: 17e451755bdeaef9b1f95f05004ae20b --Sig_/deSJvf_yIghQhAgt52JVA9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:46:18 +0100 Diego Elio Petten=C3=B2 wrote: > On 23/03/2013 17:25, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > - no 'fallback' code in header (to be added in the future), if no ABIs > > match, no code is given, >=20 > Please don't commit this without a fallback that at the very least > #errors out =E2=80=94 I don't want silent issues. While at it, is '#elif' portable enough here? I see it in C99 but you probably know more about it than I do. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/deSJvf_yIghQhAgt52JVA9d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRTecYXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKGPMQALFDw5DC0O5hcWQ5qmaSBHxf cc0/IL2TSgLu+ikiAaOkjlUT2AOGJ0Z2fD/3H8vxAPCYnhbDFgp2ZoyBrzqMgkXO eTi4C6jgNvq9MTOzecWBp35gL9+6UmStG6ktEwEGYcNpo2IU2bqoklULK7C9l8hO VZS4K/+Cp8ZeVBniO/JqCRZz8hcztpqg7hqg4FfuH4CpVhurE6GQw+kEDnbnuM61 pez8qHvi+19fy5+iu8MVaIHSd8Wu3w5eVae+FapUoBStAFrnsw4pF/bvD2tPTpbn 1DD8AZc9moBHD8yUl6GlmCSeRmqj+xEMfIC/t7pc0Fk0vsoGwmZJuiwykqkuOHBn jekOihrogq4pdc5ELSejxjePyH2CxhRMvu+nMujYw0A35lHvFwmx8j/Jo6rAK5PV 7tBEZME6JvLiTcMkuRFZ2ygr28hncdhJ9wCHPv04CcaNl/BCKUrsvSCjxZDMOPHD OUxMhYSGNM1DLJJ4J6uH0T8bnj7jTkCG0Yw3rDeRPBE4jtcbsy2OGEnGZG9+YPb3 tfvdsXEKWy9wVMhCkDRd7tyy3WUcpfbmDnwkF2MrdDvLrokiWXdqwKBaMaidYLrM AiGwDUTHRr8udec5hgZK3YtFWYJB5kid8r4+eob2gKMx4v2PfSNXXFUAVG1cg9FP rS4HbKfijITgT840W4nq =Bocg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/deSJvf_yIghQhAgt52JVA9d--