From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE41198005 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 221FAE06FC; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 343BFE06C2 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (87-205-48-218.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.48.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18F6633DBCE; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 04:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:44:20 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: robbat2@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo GPG key policies Message-ID: <20130315054420.405f0711@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20130227161214.4bfde7e9@mygoo.lnet> <20130314091252.GF27080@orbis-terrarum.net> <5141EC0C.6090108@gentoo.org> <20130314171415.525323a2@pomiocik.lan> <5142883E.6080006@gmail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/2_.ghOHEN8HWvYzBy_tcanM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 8d0037cb-a627-4d4a-9528-36e8695c0f14 X-Archives-Hash: 131f53d642bc630601866f0013998eb3 --Sig_/2_.ghOHEN8HWvYzBy_tcanM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 03:18:18 +0000 "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > if one-phase commit: > - gpg test > - gpg sign > - commit1 Why do we need additional 'gpg test' here? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/2_.ghOHEN8HWvYzBy_tcanM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRQqcoXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKKdEP/RbvuFeqF//P699bwvuWhc2k JPF47IaBcEOAyVnZdLc1gHMQoGCrHTqLtEpPMtCY0CN5yGtkgz9lcJlMmbH3Qh3M 2s35uLspIDyqd1tmT7lIWrYq7bIMxDEzpKoEDb03rqX276VworgebM7cqXl8odfN u5nkS0mu1gJIVJb8DlL5Bud0OTZtn3NN7+5f1MRSiLXHZdUmwW2Ix3txuGJaEoH9 lJZ4wpC1UgCtIMT72kHBozYDwvTF+LLsR6cnuJ89SVML1QeySRp5VAKuKpuZY9on RxC+OwRX556Y1eRtJvyecncgGVy9ywxnzChTuU2XUwHmLGfE+hrmwLG2VsUvr/K/ Zo3XzuWJ3ApnsZHhB9YOMmFZ4GRhVurG3mzrGRoHjgmiRA0LfT5Ai1yyuOX/4OX/ gN7WDLdCnbITWgIkJxBwno0fYDyaWkufET4690DZwTKYh3oKVTpqufnDT8FJSilH FKE1m5wg+mIltFMIdLWhY5K8G8i9ZMOqBDDlnN8AzkhAXBJN/9ScLKVO6JZJS8an zloNNy5d8f/+f/f7dRZ7ZcpfoU/UuGsqcW72B4Fet7vo6iVJP/2l4EGNkf6RNcrw j8EsPBQLrowKXgFfVrWwb96QrwSkbwSMwQnf4YuXIvd6g8UBj7mBXDO0wSYu3gGS YxIw5xqBVf9Z++aHNCFl =b1E9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2_.ghOHEN8HWvYzBy_tcanM--