From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A96C198005 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C709E076E; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC59E074E for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-255-9-250.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.9.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59A2233C1EE; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:48:06 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ulm@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] multibuild: introduce a generic framework for custom phase functions. Message-ID: <20130310144806.57d30603@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20796.36426.784707.254728@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <20130310111644.0840d935@pomiocik.lan> <1362910691-8439-1-git-send-email-mgorny@gentoo.org> <20796.28754.738984.896903@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20796.31150.637490.654018@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130310121825.054383fb@googlemail.com> <20130310141959.6217437d@pomiocik.lan> <20796.36426.784707.254728@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/NB3VoGxBo3j3MrbJSj4F35x"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 64e2f972-ef4c-436d-9d02-85ccb4620ef9 X-Archives-Hash: dd901fa580dc7fb7d1e824baf99b31d6 --Sig_/NB3VoGxBo3j3MrbJSj4F35x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 14:44:42 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >=20 > > Yep. That's why the non-quoted fragment has a safety check and dies > > if it doesn't. >=20 > It doesn't matter if there's a safety check. Bash 4 features are > simply not allowed in the tree. Is there a technical reason for that? As far as I understand it, the method used in the ebuild should guarantee that in the worst case user would have to restart emerge once. Well, unless we're talking about a theoretical package mangler which intentionally uses internal, old version of bash to prove the point. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/NB3VoGxBo3j3MrbJSj4F35x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRPI8WXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKLW0P/0ccnxY03ZlD7lOANFhjDHUY 01bewaD6okryuy5oxb/2TmRMMZoHjgxOjjdTyfR2uXHfuFYB7zWHuZTAB/zRi2hN yCIYzhHrB+PL3T24c6RC9BdF26EH6Ix5KfPZAW3kpB58q2oXRjxL/MySNeI7gX8h BumFflwSD3/upongazE+EESyxt6bt8yOPfaBe0IS1FcEB444Qoq9EXCQ9bPgWitp fq0y48UOSHhZnIrxYyd/HO/MFx+kV7V3NBl2sGXVUGYCv4U9yCbWLVlJ9oYE2FsK cAftNI/ypggADpAHBtDQO6GNrVJJwE8dT4S93TKJTjCoO1mt0qyg7UONRfSybsWD QCrTTFqydpsBox3+Jz3EeOTmfDGpdfYPcuUMqySGUspKVPN2b3rpmz7mj3qrny95 SpbdPxVaQw8luz1eklPUWqpZ/8vDME9+h+HdVs+jezju3A88n6TKNBwIz3AGJzDa uMWUQP2bUwadANXPPOFu4GLr1WQx2lmKfHZgzA1s6HzH/5YbE2vzpbNBhE5QiZyK dA13k/1VsCaMXqQGjIWVSOUAqNllL4bwK6lFBmIPseDHH8gac95EhKqx47cr5yiG VxYrjsf2FWlQXyeLuZYr2G1g97jMNxblY2/6vKYhT7r+mSv6LWxpSp5Gq1MTCz+S 3rXOsI/S9QBwFxh0TKo1 =BkkX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NB3VoGxBo3j3MrbJSj4F35x--