From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2B0198005 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3340E05EF; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A99E0529 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (77-255-31-156.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.31.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACBDC33DC00; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 17:50:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 18:50:36 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ssuominen@gentoo.org, roman.zilka@gmail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-reproducible "useless" epunt_cxx QA warning? Misguided bugs? Message-ID: <20130309185036.26d13626@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <513B70CA.5040905@gentoo.org> References: <513B70CA.5040905@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/J57LtqmpUmwoCuUmZ7opVn4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 753c1970-862b-457b-b4fa-1675c3b9e639 X-Archives-Hash: 6f8ea3b200783b5296273a6b25270a65 --Sig_/J57LtqmpUmwoCuUmZ7opVn4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:26:34 +0200 Samuli Suominen wrote: > I have to run off for few hours, like now, but this one user is filing=20 > dozens of these epunt_cxx bugs and nobody seem to be able to reproduce th= em: >=20 > http://tinyurl.com/bjwxzad >=20 > Could someone verify they are actually legimate before they get assigned= =20 > to maintainers? Oh, I see the problem now. Stupid bash, stupid loops and stupid subshelling. I'll attach a patch for the check in a minute. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/J57LtqmpUmwoCuUmZ7opVn4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRO3ZyXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKMYMQAJhRkBVFi+EacuwIYmaZz/90 ABhjicyraiBFOC2wK/mroDmi+2LRQkH37BXX/vuEChISOH6exo6jgpc7vqG/TFmU 0hg/MqdLZl8nFAtoJ0vgkDdS0i8UYomfv/+6kQAI6KOPeOpeQW/OB9rOotFKn9Bf vPKcJeg3lhqalkPZ+qe2i/ivJhIMgS8aRqmrAJ04Gn6sJJW481/Pb/VlWntfPB56 MIPuEjSj6op172g1gMXpg48zDlNU5a+mPVZeOfrYkLnqw2J9uWDKChgIELm+L2i7 TwUeIYuuPf88n0Vo2O91vpPDQp93a9rc6TV1iNDPqZGa/41oyZ3x9Knk8xtHke+x 9NP/OoVVY5ck3QxUjvaCSvF85ZST4hGMoBOCa7uYRouQrfPflpw5GsBR1NP3TnNS naBw8HMcgRKKa+Azrw8vvJNhVbcc1Yyzj4xxKl36on0DKKSNV1YGufUKFAd39RYJ AaqzATD/8dKhjjH7FP20tNQ6z3c654BSDRd2ZdUIC1fgH08fZwuz5g+igAVlIYEc 2zOvQM/ZGyIn3e/+vY9t2zMArl/wYxbqMTwoxhqwrTZKl8xe6/Vpb9nfyGhxKP9+ 8sn/iA+qsZnEE8rdCIknUT26J2QUSWd5LznkCqVH+mCiFr0qZVCB1LY042W8oZuE wbsmd70oJzkdGPVV8y2R =dVvM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/J57LtqmpUmwoCuUmZ7opVn4--