From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: mgorny@gentoo.org, tommy@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:13:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130308121306.3bcb500e@portable> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130308054723.0133e806@pomiocik.lan>
On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 05:47:23 +0100
Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:59:35 +0100
> Thomas Sachau <tommy@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure about the target of your qmake question, so as a
> > general answer:
> >
> > qmake is something like configure for qmake based build systems. If
> > you want to see the difference between qmake (32bit) and qmake
> > (64bit), run a 64bit qmake on a qmake based package and do the same
> > with a 32bit qmake and check the difference between the 2 runs.
>
> Did you try to work with our Qt maintainers to find a solution? Or did
> you just wrap it the Fedora way of solving things?
You cannot blame him for that since the main idea behind
multilib-portage is to be transparent for ebuild developers while
portage will do all the multilib magic behind our back :) This approach
has its pros and cons.
A.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-08 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-02 23:02 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs Michał Górny
2013-03-03 11:41 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-03 12:37 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-03 13:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Thomas Sachau
2013-03-03 15:24 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-03 15:47 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-03 16:10 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-03 16:27 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-03 16:35 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-03 21:39 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-04 9:42 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-03 16:58 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-03 17:18 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-03 22:25 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-04 10:02 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-04 20:17 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-07 16:29 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-07 18:59 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-08 3:17 ` Davide Pesavento
2013-03-08 14:33 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-08 4:47 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-08 11:13 ` Alexis Ballier [this message]
2013-03-08 11:10 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-08 14:44 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-09 10:45 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-04 20:49 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-04 22:21 ` Thomas Sachau
2013-03-04 22:49 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-08 18:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2013-03-07 16:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alexis Ballier
2013-03-08 16:30 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-09 10:10 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-10 13:42 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-15 10:32 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-15 14:25 ` Michał Górny
2013-03-03 16:00 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130308121306.3bcb500e@portable \
--to=aballier@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
--cc=tommy@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox