From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF20198005 for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 02:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C7E7E0746; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 02:43:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FD6E060D for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 02:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA7433DD06; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 02:43:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: Markos Chandras Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/confuse: confuse-2.7.ebuild ChangeLog Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 21:44:35 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.6; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "gentoo-dev" , qa@gentoo.org References: <20130301081602.D1F5D2171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <201303022057.29177.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3093716.a00xQSA00v"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303022144.36781.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f78e9d8a-cc58-4b20-a08b-b9843306f8b1 X-Archives-Hash: 5c4345b6da4f95f24da9adb2b662601f --nextPart3093716.a00xQSA00v Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Saturday 02 March 2013 21:01:39 Markos Chandras wrote: > On Mar 3, 2013 1:55 AM, "Mike Frysinger" wrote: > > complain to me when all these arm systems that totally had confuse > > already installed go down in fire. it literally makes 0 difference > > here. >=20 > Why would they have it installed (in stable) if it had no keywords? and if > it is such an important package why it didn't have testing keywords in the > first place? I did't say it broke something, it just feels strange and th= is > is why I asked sounds like there's no further clarification necessary =2Dmike --nextPart3093716.a00xQSA00v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRMrkUAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBNf4P/2guJQQBaKDyIZdmfhwyfbPg VnZAt/aX6jsP33eMhFEa9fcuHARjFXWzFdRr35YoXkfmcf1aoaYbkusFVQ2Kz5If UBISN5w5Dbqj5RFRFsrKucEg7tQRJH/e0NiRB9xqVbIqP3jtt/7lX+BccOHEDmRu p4q0Ih8F8tlK2xHbTWURutgUVrEbt4aI9ZxfynCs0uDi1krj8iCAyhFe27Y2muEM 0rHwRHoV73HGIP6Nzu5OT1xZJlqYbH8pa+yZ6r2IsFaVMmD7NQYaJxGb8OCB009I rSHMBUP59XRca2f8BlYYGF+es9td1UuPHRngyYkFZ6NXYHdXKfQUF5dmguI/x51n iNAoRuQaCz39a6qj5PoIraWAzUOfmcENCcNhp39H/eCjx+rTMCuspJ0LQ1AiEafG PtbqvOMjHGztrUzRvarlrh8MuBKNJhg1CFayM9c8iw+rkW5sbeN5ynkXc2LD4AxM QTqbltuoxXMbVZu0HrixQOduAjNW7tAM/IGP7WwPrAvRtNuXrBDZaGh+OM9VqS6L ZEtf9I+hY375d1rY1b6F71ndYg77p/e5is+Ya75iEG5dVkHEovw0ETEiw0Ml0qX8 Ylw85R7Om2mgeU26AlDkzhvAzMYPrT9mMEhwj+er8FTgEh7G44+9d6IFCDg0ZV5C brceacCrtqGl+mY3fQAW =UD/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3093716.a00xQSA00v--