From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:08:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130302140828.2c498a46@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB9SyzSx=Au3QXhF8Fm5NX-uMxbJMOHZq9P3LQWN5mTP5W0+zw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1456 bytes --]
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 14:54:22 +0800
Ben de Groot <yngwin@gentoo.org> wrote:
> media-video/avidemux (bundled libs)
I like this application, but am not so sure about maintaining this... =/
Would it be reasonable to create a new package avidemux-ffmpeg in which
we create a version of ffmpeg with their patches applied? Perhaps we
can also remove the parts of ffmpeg that aren't used by avidemux to
keep the overhead of having ffmpeg twice on the system low.
I don't see any other reliable solution, unless upstream is willing to
stop bundling ffmpeg and get their patches incorporated on that.
But upon reading the progress on Debian, there is barely any progress
on that as far as I am aware of; and I'm not willing to maintain a
package that has 1) an unpatched ffmpeg that breaks it for people or
2) a bundled ffmpeg that keeps it from getting unmasked / reliable / ...
The other approach is for someone to attempt to try to get all these
patches upstream, but some of them are undocumented which makes it hard
to understand what the changes actually are done for; and at this point
in time it is not guaranteed that ffmpeg would take these patches.
So, what is the Qt herd's opinion on creating a avidemux-ffmpeg package?
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-02 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-02 6:54 [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help! Ben de Groot
2013-03-02 7:57 ` Diego Elio Pettenò
2013-03-03 9:43 ` Ben de Groot
2013-03-02 12:26 ` Jauhien Piatlicki
2013-03-03 9:44 ` Ben de Groot
2013-03-02 12:33 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-03-03 10:09 ` Ben de Groot
2013-03-02 12:36 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-02 13:08 ` Tom Wijsman [this message]
2013-03-02 13:29 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-03-02 14:35 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-03-02 14:39 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-03-02 17:27 ` Ben de Groot
2013-03-02 19:35 ` Davide Pesavento
2013-03-02 13:32 ` Alexis Ballier
2013-03-02 14:41 ` Tom Wijsman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130302140828.2c498a46@gentoo.org \
--to=tomwij@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox