From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D15D198005 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49A41E05ED; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B13E055C for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portable (AMontpellier-651-1-453-97.w81-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.251.252.97]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AE3733DCC1 for ; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:55:12 +0100 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-libs/freetype: freetype-2.4.11-r1.ebuild ChangeLog Message-ID: <20130302115512.10c1eedb@portable> In-Reply-To: <512E76B9.2050201@gentoo.org> References: <20130225222029.D84D12171D@flycatcher.gentoo.org> <512E3E06.8010205@gentoo.org> <20130227185824.08f0d035@portable> <512E4D0E.9070700@gentoo.org> <20130227192722.65a55ac5@portable> <1361996719.1929.10.camel@belkin4> <512E76B9.2050201@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.16; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 79e1aacf-72c3-44b9-aff8-f7bb458f3bf9 X-Archives-Hash: 621dccd420d37e00b38db1dd125e9d32 On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:12:25 +0100 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Pacho Ramos schrieb: > > El mi=C3=A9, 27-02-2013 a las 19:27 +0100, Alexis Ballier escribi=C3=B3: > > [...] > >>> The reason I bring this up again is that there was a strong > >>> argument yesterday in #gentoo-dev, so it seems the situation is > >>> NOT clear. > >> > >> What are these arguments ? The IRC conspiracy is hard to follow :) > >> > >=20 > > I also read that argument... but it looked to turn more in a > > "personal" flame war than anything "technical". For example, I > > couldn't see how multilib-portage solves the issue of different > > headers provided for different arches (that looks to be the key > > problem that mgorny tried to solve in freetype) > >=20 >=20 > multilib-portage has no issues with abi-specific headers, since those > are installed into a seperate abi-specific location > inside /usr/include with a wrapper in the original location to not > break depending packages. yes, thats the kind of solution that should be implemented for freetype too. putting all headers under /usr/lib doesnt seem sane. There exist default locations for headers for a reason, leveraging the issue to using pkg-config seems wrong.